General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOnly 20% of patients intubated survive
It means 80% of patients will die. I remember seeing that some doctors are now performing less of them.
They are using alternatives to deliver oxygen.
Mosby
(16,350 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Read a Dr.'s warning of all the complications after the treatment, most related to serious heart issues.I
Good news is they have discovered lying on your stomach is often an effective way to increase oxygen saturation,
and some patients can avoid ventilators all together.
spinbaby
(15,090 posts)I have a friend whos a respiratory therapist. She says theyve had good luck with repositioning patients. She also keeps telling me to STAY THE F### HOME!
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Just found out my son has it, he's on the West Coast, I'm in the South.
I want to give him info. about this.
spinbaby
(15,090 posts)Im not in touch with my friend much nowadays because shes working mandatory overtime, but she did say I should get used to lying on my stomachthat position apparently lets lungs expand more. Also something about a special bed that rotates patients, but I know nothing about that except she wants more of them. Sorry I cant be more helpful.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)They use it a lot for paraplegics, to avoid bed sores as well as help with breathing.
Very space age like.
pattyloutwo
(279 posts)and put patients prone on stomachs. Read article in newspaper today. Sorry no link, dont know original source of article.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I don't know if that's particular to obstructive apnea or what.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)The machine works in any sleeping position.
tblue37
(65,483 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)But if you use the machine the positive pressure holds the throat open. I sleep on sides and back. I was never told to sleep on stomach, and Im not sure Id want to with a bad neck.
Celerity
(43,497 posts)Igel
(35,356 posts)It's a progression. You start with a bit of oxygen in a nose tube. Ramp that up. Blood-ox levels continue to drop, you move to face mask. Eventually the lungs aren't working well enough and blood oxygen levels fall to below 90% or so, and you intubate.
Many still don't reach the necessary blood oxygen levels even with intubation.
Not many easy alternatives. They can use a machine that draws blood, oxygenates it outside the body, and returns it, but those aren't the most common things on Earth and require close monitoring--meaning that they need additional staff.
This is where some of that Star Trek "tri-ox" or whatever would come in handy--one shot and your blood oxygen levels go up for a while. http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=3689
Intubation is sort of nasty, though. Paralyze the lungs (don't want competition--that could cause damage); intubate, this tube going down your throat with gag reflexes and all. Then if you get anxious or agitated (gee, ya think) you're sedated. And you might stay on that for weeks, with a 20% chance of being able to actually be free.
BGBD
(3,282 posts)I believe good outcomes are generally pretty low for anyone suffering ARDS who are intubated.
OhioChick
(23,218 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)OhioChick
(23,218 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Thank you for the link, I will send it on.
herding cats
(19,567 posts)It's not a first round treatment choice, ever. The longer you're on the more risk there is for the patient. It's not something to take lightly under any circumstance.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)Breathe at the same rate and speed for days. Do not slow down the heart for rest. Force the oxygen into the patient. I could see problems with that. Probably does more damage than good? And I'm no doctor.
mnhtnbb
(31,402 posts)and we were seeing stories based on China and Italy, that the anecdotal experience was about 50% survival rate from being placed on a ventilator. If so, this is really going the wrong direction to see only a 14-20% survival rate.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)among new infections will die.
Celerity
(43,497 posts)have heard. Most say 2.5 to 4.5%, with a few saying 5%
I think it is around 3 to 3.5% or so.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)this morning on First Look on MSNBC when they did their morning review of illness and deaths. It was an eye opener.
retread
(3,763 posts)Response to Blueplanet (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hugin
(33,198 posts)You have to ask yourself how many of that 20% would have survived had the procedure not been done.
Don't confuse correlation with causation.
It's statistics.
Zeus69
(391 posts)This excellent short video by the "Failing😏" NY Times shows the conundrum those on the front lines are facing regarding Covid 19 and indications for ventilation.
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000007082510/coronavirus-treatment.html