General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWaPo: Mr. Romney’s rhetoric on embassy attacks discredits his campaign
J.CHRISTOPHER STEVENS, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, was a skilled and courageous diplomat who repeatedly placed himself at risk in order to support the cause of a democratic Libya. His death, along with those of three other Americans, during an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on Tuesday is a tragedy that should prompt bipartisan support for renewed U.S. aid to Libyans who are struggling to stabilize the country. That it instead provoked a series of crude political attacks on President Obama by GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is a discredit to his campaign.
Mr. Romneys first rhetorical assault came Tuesday night in response to a statement by the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, which was also besieged by demonstrators Tuesday. His statement claimed that the administrations first response was to sympathize with those who waged the attacks. In fact the embassy statement was issued before the protests began; referring to an ugly anti-Islam film that was the focus of demonstrators, it condemned those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious belief of others.
Mr. Romney did not then know the extent of the Benghazi incident his statement referred only to the death of an American consulate worker. So it was stunning to see the GOP nominee renew his verbal offensive Wednesday morning, when the country was still absorbing the news of the first death in service of a U.S. ambassador since 1988, as well as the loss of three other Americans. Though reports were still sketchy, it appeared that a militant jihadist group, Ansar al-Sharia, took advantage of the Benghazi protest to stage an armed assault that overwhelmed the Libyan security force at the consulate.
At a news conference, Mr. Romney claimed that the administration had delivered an apology for Americas values. In fact, it had done no such thing: Religious tolerance, as much as freedom of speech, is a core American value. The movie that provoked the protests, which mocks the prophet Mohammed and portrays Muslims as immoral and violent, is a despicable piece of bigotry; it was striking that Mr. Romney had nothing to say about such hatred directed at a major religious faith.
more....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-death-of-an-ambassador/2012/09/12/ed3b719e-fcfa-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_print.html
And rec.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)"At a news conference, Mr. Romney claimed that the administration had delivered an apology for Americas values. In fact, it had done no such thing: Religious tolerance, as much as freedom of speech, is a core American value. The movie that provoked the protests, which mocks the prophet Mohammed and portrays Muslims as immoral and violent, is a despicable piece of bigotry; it was striking that Mr. Romney had nothing to say about such hatred directed at a major religious faith."
Exactly. That's what I've been thinking all morning. Are we to conclude that a Romney administration would have puffed up its chest and released a statement defending this example of religious bigotry as a core American value? FFS, right-wingers are constantly clamoring for Muslim leaders to speak out against their loonies...yet Mitt demands we defend ours...horseshyte.
smorkingapple
(827 posts)Watch for more editorials saying exactly this in the coming days.
BumRushDaShow
(129,649 posts)much like McLame's Hail Mary "suspend the campaign" moment - in fact during this same week 4 years ago.