Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,075 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 08:58 AM Apr 2020

Richard Stengel: Why Trump's Coronavirus Optimism Isn't Working

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/04/why-trump-coronavirus-optimism-isnt-working

Coronavirus
Why Trump’s Coronavirus Optimism Isn’t Working
When FDR projected optimism in the depths of the Great Depression, it was based on candor and competence. Trump is trying to mimic it, but his own lies undermine him.
By Richard Stengel
April 20, 2020


On a blustery March morning, when Franklin Delano Roosevelt stood behind a podium on the East Portico of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., to give his inaugural address, America was in the depths of the Great Depression. Most banks were shuttered, millions had lost their life savings, and about a quarter of Americans were unemployed. It was a dark moment. FDR sought to project optimism, but it was optimism seasoned with candor. Though the best known line in that speech occurs in the fifth sentence of the opening paragraph, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself,” the second sentence declares, “This is preeminently the time to speak the truth.” In that brief opening paragraph of 153 words, he mentions not only “truth,” but “candor,” and “frankness.”

The projection of optimism is a hallmark of great leaders, and FDR might have been our greatest model of that presidential virtue. But from the first he was clear that in times of crisis, optimism also required realism—realism in the form of honesty about the nature of the challenge itself. He understood that to engage a whole nation, he could not sugarcoat the task ahead. Optimism had to be earned. In President Donald Trump’s efforts to project optimism, he has been anything but candid and honest. To simply say, “We see light at the end of the tunnel,” without facts or data to back it up, is not optimism but dissembling. Optimism unaccompanied by realism is hollow. Trump’s optimism is more like that of the classic American species, “the confidence man,” the swindler who sells you a bill of goods and then moves on to the next sucker. Moreover, his optimism always seems self-serving, as though it is more about people rewarding him for being upbeat than how he is grappling with the crisis itself. As FDR said in the third paragraph of his inaugural address, “Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment.”

FDR’s projection of optimism was also rooted in morality and ethics. This is true of almost all American presidents. In his inaugural he criticizes greed (“the falsity of material wealth”), saying that American restoration depends on the extent to which “we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit.” This is contrasted with Trump’s complete lack of a moral or ethical call to duty, and his repeated declaration that we must “reopen the economy,” without citing any moral value to that other than an increase in the GDP or the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It is more about his obvious disappointment that “the greatest economy in the history of our country” (a ridiculously false claim, by the way) is under siege by a virus.

snip//

FDR also projected optimism by being unruffled in the face of crisis. With his cigarette holder pointed upward like the trajectory of a rising graph, his V-for-victory salute, his jaunty smile, he projected a never-let-them-see-you-sweat confidence. FDR wore pounds of steel braces to give a speech or get in or out of a car, but would never ever project self-pity. Eleanor Roosevelt said of her husband that even after he had been struck with polio, “I never heard him complain.” Trump, on the other hand, seems to make himself the primary victim of the pandemic, as though it was aimed directly at him. No matter the crisis, he is always the first casualty. Instead of talking about the real victims—those who are ill and those who have died—he spends much of his daily press conferences blaming and accusing others for failures that are attributable to him. FDR had his own grievances with the press, and once complained that he thought 85% of the press was against him. But he would never let the public see him wounded by the press or publicly label them “the enemy of the people.”

Part of the reason presidents attempt to project optimism is so Americans will feel confident in their government. Roosevelt was also intent on changing the perception of government from a distant and indifferent bystander to a direct means of support for people in trouble. Roosevelt said the public welfare was the great duty of the state, and he attempted to give people confidence in the federal government. That has been difficult for Trump to do. From his boasting that avoiding taxes was the “smart” thing to do to his offhand remark last month that the federal government was “not a shipping clerk,” his disdain for the idea that government has a role in the public welfare has been painfully obvious. Trump is a manifestation of three decades of Republicans running against government. His understanding of federalism is minimal, and he tasks the states with jobs that should be carried out by the administration. Now, when he wants people to trust government to do the right thing, he has a hard time making that argument. You can project cheap optimism and unsupported confidence as much as you want, but reality is a stubborn thing. Ultimately—and particularly in a crisis—confidence in a leader comes from one thing: competence.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Richard Stengel: Why Trump's Coronavirus Optimism Isn't Working (Original Post) babylonsister Apr 2020 OP
if you've listened to his reading onethatcares Apr 2020 #1
fdr? on a good day, donnie is emulating hoover. unblock Apr 2020 #2
Hoover Actually Did Something ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #4
that's why i said "on a good day" unblock Apr 2020 #7
+1 (nt) ProfessorGAC Apr 2020 #9
Spot on. Mike 03 Apr 2020 #3
Kick and recommend. Trumpolini is the opposite of FDR. bronxiteforever Apr 2020 #5
In order for people to believe you, they have to trust you tulipsandroses Apr 2020 #6
Yeah, as others have said musclecar6 Apr 2020 #8

onethatcares

(16,174 posts)
1. if you've listened to his reading
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 09:03 AM
Apr 2020

you would find it hard to believe he knows what he's saying let alone believe in it.

ProfessorGAC

(65,090 posts)
4. Hoover Actually Did Something
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 09:18 AM
Apr 2020

Quite late, but he did make moves, including those he knew would alienate some allies.
The notion he did nothing is kind of a myth.
So, Hoover even in 1930 & 1931 was working & trying way harder that Dolt45.

unblock

(52,268 posts)
7. that's why i said "on a good day"
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 09:30 AM
Apr 2020

i think hoover was sincere and empathetic, he was just rather wrong in his assessment of the situation. he doesn't compare well to most presidents, but donnie is so thoroughly awful a human being that even presidents like hoover and shrub come out looking quite normal and decent by comparison.

but yeah, hoover was trying to make the country better, the whole country, not just himself and some rich cronies. donnie's more obsessed about his ratings and playing vengeance games with democratic governors, and he's eager to kill americans by sending us back to the mines in order to further line his pockets. hoover was a saint by comparison.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
3. Spot on.
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 09:13 AM
Apr 2020

Trump also lacks the ability to sustain his fake empathy for more than a few sentences. He gets one honest question from a reporter and he drops the mask immediately, just gives up and reverts to form. In sports it used to be called "tanking."

Charlottesville was a prescient example. First he gave the speech he wanted to give, then he gave a speech written for him he didn't want to give and hated it (vowed never to "give in" again), then gave the third speech, a disaster, but a speech he was proud of because he "sounded tough." IIRC, it was Melania's favorite of the three. (Source: either Fire and Fury or Woodward's Fear)

bronxiteforever

(9,287 posts)
5. Kick and recommend. Trumpolini is the opposite of FDR.
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 09:19 AM
Apr 2020

“Confidence... thrives on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful protection and on unselfish performance. Without them it cannot live.” FDR

tulipsandroses

(5,124 posts)
6. In order for people to believe you, they have to trust you
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 09:19 AM
Apr 2020

He's been lying and gaslighting the public from day one. They know he lies. It was previously an acceptable part of this presidency because people did not think his lies and corruption affected them. They thought, its just politics as usual, it does not affect me personally. The Mueller report, Ukraine, profiting from his hotels. Many people did not think that affected them so did not care about his lying. Now, this virus, the economy affects them personally.
They cannot look away this time around. Of course you have the Fox News crowd that will always be there, so not talking about them. The rest of America that did not care about his lies before, care about how it affects their lives now.


musclecar6

(1,690 posts)
8. Yeah, as others have said
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 10:04 AM
Apr 2020

Enough of the fools who still support and kiss this guy’s ass, may finally stop defending this con man liar and a cheat, when his incompetence starts killing off people at an alarming rate and some of their family friends neighbors etc, start dropping like fly’s as he pushes to open the economy way too fast without the necessary testing and tracing.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Richard Stengel: Why Tru...