General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy best spin for Birx
Well, for starters, she is an actual scientist so she doesn't spout babble and total lies that directly contradict the real science and known evidence. OK, that's a fairly low bar for someone who works in public health, but some times she does actually communicate facts. Maybe of greater significance, she has now positioned herself to retain credibility not so much with folks like us here, but with Trumpster FOX viewer types, and that matters because there are tens of millions of them. And my body will not politically differentiate between potentially getting infected from exposure, directly or indirectly, to an environmental activist Covid-19 carrier rather than from a Trump loving gun hugging racist Covid-19 carreir. Either way my life will be equally at risk. So someone has to be able to make the case to Fox viewers that the threat from Covid-19 is real and exists now in real time, regardless of how she may fudge about the future, without them muting the volume when they see someone with actual knowledge about the virus talking on their screen.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)Hes [Trump] been so attentive to the scientific literature and the details and the data, Birx said. I think his ability to analyze and integrate data that comes out of his long history in business has really been a real benefit during these discussions about medical issues.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)No break from me.
dalton99a
(81,526 posts)Shit, the chemical dangers are known to every Chemistry 101 student
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Polly Hennessey
(6,799 posts)She may be a scientist but she is a complicit one. For all we know she may be a climate change denier. The good doctor may not be so good after all.
lark
(23,121 posts)She lies to cover for drumpf so is acceptable to Faux - which makes her totally unacceptable for our real lives. She is part of his killing cabal and is furthering his efforts at no testing and opening up in an unsafe way so that we are in another total breakdown by election time - that is 1/2 of what this is about. The rest is pure profiteering, stealing vital supplies from Americans, killing us and the blue states on purpose.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)millions of Americans.
LAS14
(13,783 posts).. use face masks?
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... for how draining it must be for both her and Fauci to work in that environment. And I'm VERY GRATEFUL, that they manage not to get removed. Although Fauci seems to have been pretty much muzzled. Has anyone seen him on TV lately?
mercuryblues
(14,532 posts)as a cure.
malaise
(269,063 posts)She so wants that HHS Secretary job
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)malaise
(269,063 posts)dalton99a
(81,526 posts)malaise
(269,063 posts)I've stopped trying to figure out most human beings.
rurallib
(62,426 posts)Demsrule86
(68,595 posts)She is lying for the Trump and now attacking the media ...who are telling the truth ...not like her and Trump. Scientist can be politically motivated just like anyone else and are also at time liars while promoting themselves.
librechik
(30,674 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)but personally I distrust her.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)I fear she can be an enabler by cleaning up after Trump. But Trump does what he does regardless of whether or not anyone tries to give him any partial cover, and his bleach drinkers listen to him anyway. There are millions who only trust Trump and those who appear to have his blessing. Right now she seems to be in that latter grouping, so they don't shut down when she starts to talk. And as subservient as she may seem to have become, she still provides a much saner view of this pandemic than anything that Trump is capable of grasping or personally accepting. At best she is a mixed blessing, and this is a time when we should count our blessings, mixed as they might be.
Boomerproud
(7,955 posts)She is not trustworthy. I am 100% all OUT.