General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTucker loses Disney
Last edited Thu Jun 11, 2020, 11:57 AM - Edit history (1)
@JuddLegum
UPDATE: This morning, I reported that @Disney was still advertising on Tucker Carlson, who is using his platform to trash the Black Lives Matter movement
A few minutes ago, Disney told me it will no longer run ads on the program
UPDATE (6/10): Disney tells Popular Information that it will no longer advertise on Tucker Carlson. The company says the ads were placed through a third party ad buyer and the company was not previously aware they were running during the show. Disney says it has instructed the third party to stop placing ads on Tucker Carlson moving forward.
https://popular.info/p/five-corporations-that-say-they-support
Link to tweet
?s=20
UPDATED:
Fucker Carlson keeps repeating his own dumb history. The Fox News host again is losing advertisers after saying racist stuff.
Disney, T-Mobile, SmileDirectClub, Papa Johns and Vari have pulled their commercials from Tucker Carlson Tonight, Media Matters reported Wednesday.
The exodus came after Carlson on Monday warned viewers of his popular show on the conservative cable network that Black Lives Matters protests sparked by the police killing of George Floyd were not about Black lives, and remember that when they come for you.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tucker-carlson-loses-advertisers-george-floyd_n_5ee1f748c5b67cba495cbe2e
Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Spending millions of $$$ on TV ads and then oh hey...just place em....somewhere!!
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)This came out right after Stoneman-Douglas. If its a cool company it does what Disney did, told their agency to not place ads on that show.
Auggie
(31,169 posts)never put two and two together. Could be a lame-ass ad manger on the Disney side too.
I've experienced it first hand. The level of marketing competency is continually spiraling downward.
yellowdogintexas
(22,252 posts)revealed the whole third party ad blocks. Many of those companies asked to have their ads pulled.
Coventina
(27,120 posts)I know it doesn't make sense, but that's how advertising works these days.
You can experiment with it yourself:
Set up a "news website" and in no time you'll be getting ad revenue from these companies that are paid by corporations to place their ads.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)manhattan123
(302 posts)Especially ones that have a lot of constantly changing products (in this case, movies).
They have an ad agency and media buyers who look at the demos and place the buys. Frankly, I'm not sure what demo Tucker Carlson has that would be interested in Disney movies?
Also, especially with cable TV, they buy in bulk with a cable provider, Comcast, Spectrum, Fios, etc.
calimary
(81,267 posts)I sent an email this morning, complaining about it.
email@mail.msnbc.com
rachel@msnbc.com
maddow@msnbc.com
manhattan123
(302 posts)Just as with regular broadcast TV, some of the ads you see during a show are running on the entire, say, CBS network, but some are sold by and running only on your local CBS station, which is given a certain amount of time each hour. That's how they make their money.
The cable systems do the same. Some ads are bought and air nationally on MSNBC, but some ad time is set aside for the local cable providers to sell, and are only running in that market.
MSNBC doesn't even know, and has no control over the ads sold locally. Unless it violates a decency clause, they can't stop the local provider from selling to the Trump campaign.
SCantiGOP
(13,870 posts)While cable networks are private entities, they also have most of the same "use of public airways" rules that traditional broadcasters have.
And I don't think we should be scared to see trump ads showing up on our screens.
marble falls
(57,083 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)LaMouffette
(2,030 posts)And do it publicly, write letters to their advertisers, make phone calls to them, protest in front of their company buildings, make it news, and make it leave a mark!
If I recall, boycotts were instrumental in ending apartheid in South Africa. Maybe it would work to defund Fox. Here's an LA Times article on successful and not-so-successful boycotts:
[link:https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-boycotts-history-20180228-htmlstory.html|
Does anyone have a list of Fox advertisers? I couldn't find one when I googled it. I would hate to have to compile a list by (shudder) actually watching Fox, but I will if I have to.
Lonestarblue
(9,988 posts)From Media Matters (July 2019) https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/these-are-fox-news-leading-advertisers
Heres another one. http://foxnewsboycott.com/fox-news-sponsors/fox-sponsors-a-l/
This site lists Sean Hannity advertisers (also from July 2019) https://www.mediamatters.org/sean-hannity/these-are-sean-hannitys-leading-advertisers
Im attaching an article from Hollywood Reporter listing some top advertisers. Representatives for Nutrisystem, the network's top 2020 advertiser, Liberty Mutual Insurance, Nugenix, Sandals Resorts, Sleep Number, GEICO, Intuit, NewDay USA, Norton, Progressive, DealDash and Allstate did not respond. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/fox-news-top-advertisers-silent-coronavirus-coverage-1287839
This article is a good cross reference (also from 2019) because it lists companies that pulled advertising from Tucker Carlson in 2019, so no need to contact them.
Have fun!
LaMouffette
(2,030 posts)I'm on it!
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)fees it charges the cable companies I heard.
If I recall it adds something like 2 to 3 dollars to everyone's cable bill where as the other news stations only add a dollar or so.
LaMouffette
(2,030 posts)If we could drive Fox News off the air, it would still exist on the internet. But I bet that much of its audience over 50 years old would not bother going online to watch it.
Hmm . . . !
Thanks, cstanleytech!
bucolic_frolic
(43,162 posts)Are all those highly paid execs exercising strict oversight how they spend shareholder's - the owners' - money?
Did they really just admit that?
jaxexpat
(6,829 posts)Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Did Disney know about their spots on Carlson's show? I doubt that it was a great corporate concern. I would think, though, that there is at least one person from Marketing who has the job of watching over Marketing's ad budget, to see where it's paying off, or not.
bucolic_frolic
(43,162 posts)I just don't know. To me it seems a lot like phoning it in so to speak. I suppose you trust the company that manages ad portfolios just like you pick and trust an investment manager. There is often a bit more to corporate stewardship, though, than the bottom line. Image, bedfellows, timing, strategic planning, etc.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Coventina
(27,120 posts)Ad placement is almost never decided by high-level people at the particular company, anymore.
There are "people" for that, and more often than not, they are contracted by the company, and not actually company employees.
zak247
(251 posts)Someone should tell Glen Greenwald to stop going on his show.
Cha
(297,240 posts)maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)and then come back later when everyone's looking elsewhere.
A sale is a sale; can't let those eyeballs go.
Cirque du So-What
(25,938 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,806 posts)Trump family enterprises can take over the ad spaces.
Fox might even give them a discount.
Miigwech
(3,741 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,733 posts)hunter
(38,312 posts)... and Disney knows it.
warmfeet
(3,321 posts)I support horse crap, much more than tucker.
Wednesdays
(17,374 posts)for farming and gardening.
Tucker, not so much.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)You racist POS! Let's hope it's the start of a trend.
npk
(3,660 posts)This dipshit cannot be removed fast enough from the airwaves. He really thinks highly of himself too doesn't he.
smb
(3,471 posts)Whatever for? Were they perhaps planning to release Song of the South?