General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMA Senate race is lit! Markey/Kennedy powerhouse is heating up!
I really like them both. But this seems to be politics in the day of saying bye to Establishment candidates & hello to young millennial progressive thinkers.
This is one to watch! go 💙 & 💙.
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/06/13/ed-markey-joe-kennedy-massachusetts-316556
The Massachusetts Democratic Senate primary faded into the background here in recent months as the coronavirus pandemic overshadowed everything else.
But if the most recent Senate debate between Sen. Ed Markey and Rep. Joe Kennedy III is any indication, thats about to change.
MA lends us its finest, again.
Thanks MA.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Merlot
(9,696 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)He is playing by their same rules & not doing a bad job of it either!
I think it shows us that he has a firm desire to add his name for many years to come to our Democratic Senate.
Had Hillary Clinton been our 2016 President, Warren would have been offered a cabinet position.
She had already endorsed Kennedy for her Senate seat should that have happened.
Sen Warren was his Harvard professor & he quotes:
She was the toughest teacher on campus but the waitlist to be in her class was always a mile long, Kennedy, now a member of the U.S. House, said of Warren, now a U.S. Senator
I don't believe there's much bad blood between our MA Democrats.
There does appear to be much respect.
💙
Walleye
(31,068 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)Forty Four years.
Kennedy is a fine representative to carry the Senate Democratic seat forward into the future.
His lineage has a solid Democratic base, with his own millennial ideas for the future direction of American govt.
Like I said, this is a race to watch since both are well served in MA politics.
aikoaiko
(34,185 posts)So be it. It's the choice of MA voters.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)Let the voters decide. If they are both our guys, then frankly, the voters have a good choice.
Budi
(15,325 posts)Its his right to do so & up to his team to run the campaign.
That's American politics.
I'm good with either & have no skin in this State.
Best of Luck to both 💙
nsd
(2,406 posts)Both Crowley and Capuano were good Democrats and mostly progressive.
Ocasio-Cortez and Pressley ousted them not on ideological or policy or effectiveness grounds, but on generational and ethnic grounds. Kennedy's argument is also generational, though not ethnic.
I don't buy it. If I still lived in Massachusetts I'd vote for Markey, but it is what it is.
Budi
(15,325 posts)Sanders group has no issue with that new challenger.
So what's the difference in MA.
Says their reasons aren't exactly ironclad across the board.
Whatever. A vote for either Markey or Kennedy would be based on future rather than performance. They both have carried the Dem torch with pride.
people
(633 posts)AOC supports Markey, the incumbant.
boston bean
(36,224 posts)Markey will be fine.
I am going to vote for Kennedy.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)I don't take such things into consideration.
boston bean
(36,224 posts)Not when MA vote republican sometimes. Lets get the seats safe for a while.
We have a repug governor right now.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Charlie Baker is a complete aberration.
boston bean
(36,224 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)I'd say the landscape has shifted and the bench in Massachusetts has gotten a hell of a lot deeper since Muh Pickup Truck Brown squeaked by a candidate who couldn't bother to campaign in a special election.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)Takes a special one to lose twice in a Dem state.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Kennedy, Pressley, Healey, among others.
boston bean
(36,224 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)boston bean
(36,224 posts)stillcool
(32,626 posts)but Markey is comfortable.. like Kerry and Kennedy. A known quantity. He's been representing MA since 1976.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... the Green New Deal. I don't see any "comfortableness" about him at all. I'm pissed at Kennedy.
Budi
(15,325 posts)SEN Engel:
. I am proud to be an original co-sponsor of the first Green New Deal legislation, authored by Senator Markey and my House colleague Representative Ocasio-Cortez.
The goals of the Green New Deal, in addition to ending our use of fossil fuel, include expanding job opportunities for Americans in the burgeoning clean energy sector. This will in turn ensure that as our energy sector transforms, so too will our economy. No longer will a select few stand to gain from the economic prosperity a 21st century economy can offer.
As a member of the Safe Climate Caucus, Engel has authored and successfully passed numerous amendments to appropriations bills that require all new federal vehicles to be alternative fuel vehicles. He has also cosponsored bills that would bring an end to new fossil fuel projects and move our electricity and most transportation systems to 100% renewable energy by 2035.
https://engel.house.gov/latest-news/engel-joins-rep-ocasiocortez-senator-markey-at-green-new-deal-introduction/
Just thought this needed to be noted.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Kennedy has been an outstanding congressman for the district bordering my area. But his ambition is gonna get the better of him, like his cousin Patrick.
MagickMuffin
(15,961 posts)What if Elizabeth is the VP candidate, Joe could run for her seat.
Why oust someone who has done an excellent job in his position?
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)Kennedy has a very progressive agenda as well.
The similarities are so close, one in the House & one in the Senate.
Establishment vs Progressive, fresh face, millennial vs...
You see where this MA race has flipped the Justice Dems argument for new & younger candidates challenging the established Dems, completely on its head?
Joe Kennedy has a very progressive record, btw. So that's a non-comparison point.
Oh well! Good luck to you MA!
Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)I read a good article about Kennedy's reasons last month:
https://www.businessinsider.com/why-rep-joe-kennedy-is-primarying-sen-ed-markey-massachusetts-2020-5
"'For a very long time in Massachusetts, those two seats were held by John Kerry and Ted Kennedy. There was literally a quarter of a century where those were the two Senators, and people's career ambitions came and went over a generation with no opportunity there,' Bernstein said."
I find that problematic. A lot of my family members didn't support Obama's 2008 run initially. They felt he should have waited his turn and let Hilary Clinton get it. I said, if you don't strike when the iron is hot, you might lose out forever. Maybe he would have won in 2016 or he would be the presumptive nominee now, but you just can't tell how these things will go. I don't think anyone's ambitions need to wait until the torch is passed.
Budi
(15,325 posts)Look at how many old Repubs are STILL clinging to their seats from 50 years ago. How long was Strom Thurmond in his seat? Didn't he almost die on the Senate floor? Maybe I'm thinking of another lifer Repub.
Politics is stalled more because of the Repub lifers than by any Dem.
Regardless, Yes. Term limits.
blueniteflower
(38 posts)I like what he has done for MA. There is very little difference between the two except for age and name. Name trumps for me, because growing up with very little and seeing all the people who had the "right" last name get all the privileges, I would have been inclined to vote for an other up and comer if they were not a Kennedy. Happy to vote for him against any republican though.