General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJon Stewart Is Back to Weigh In (NYT Interview)
Talk June 15, 2020
By David Marchese
Photograph by Bobby Doherty
For all the value Jon Stewart delivered as a political satirist and voice of reason during his 16-year-run as the host of The Daily Show, its quite plausible to suggest that the political and media Bizarro World in which we live where skepticism is the default, news is often indistinguishable from entertainment and entertainers have usurped public authority from the countrys political leaders is one that he and his show helped to usher in. Look, we certainly were part of that ecosystem, but I dont think that news became entertainment because they thought our show was a success, Stewart says. Twenty-four-hour news networks are built for one thing, and thats 9/11. There are very few events that would justify being covered 24 hours a day, seven days a week. So in the absence of urgency, they have to create it. You create urgency through conflict. That pervasive sense of political and social conflict has only grown since Stewart left the air in 2015. It has also made Stewarts post-Daily Show silence apart from a few guest spots on his old friend and colleague Stephen Colberts show, he has been mostly out of the spotlight more intriguing. What has he been thinking about this country while he has been gone? Now he has returned with some answers.
Stewart, who is 57, has written and directed Irresistible, a political satire about a small Wisconsin town that becomes engulfed in a political spectacle when a Democratic strategist and his Republican counterpart become fixated on the larger symbolic value and bellwether potential of the local mayoral race. The film, which will make its theatrical and video-on-demand premiere on June 26, is evidence that being away from the grind of a daily TV show has expanded rather than shrunk Stewarts satirical powers. Hes well aware, though, that in this exceedingly polarized time, making a comedy that takes shots at both political parties, as Irresistible does, is an invitation to criticism. Youre going to have people on the left who go, In the time of Trump, all you should be doing is a Fahrenheit 11/9' there is no purpose other than to destroy the mother ship, Stewart says. And the other sides possible reaction to his return? There are people on the right predisposed to say, [expletive] that guy. Some things never change.
How strange is it, after having been basically out of the public eye for five years, to be coming back with something now? The world is on fire, heres my new movie seems like an awkward spot to be in. Its like showing up to a plane crash with a chocolate bar. Theres tragedy everywhere, and youre like, Uh, does anybody want chocolate? It feels ridiculous. But what doesnt feel ridiculous is to continue to fight for nuance and precision and solutions.
You know, Ive been trying to think of some precise, encapsulating question to ask you about what weve been witnessing over the last few weeks, and everything I was coming up with felt forced or phony. Maybe its better, because youve been eloquent during times of crisis in the past, just to ask what youve been thinking about and seeing in the aftermath of George Floyds killing? Id like to say Im surprised by what happened to him, but Im not. This is a cycle, and I feel that in some ways, the issue is that were addressing the wrong problem. We continue to make this about the police the how of it. How can they police? Is it about sensitivity and de-escalation training and community policing? All that can make for a less-egregious relationship between the police and people of color. But the how isnt as important as the why, which we never address. The police are a reflection of a society. Theyre not a rogue alien organization that came down to torment the black community. Theyre enforcing segregation. Segregation is legally over, but it never ended. The police are, in some respects, a border patrol, and they patrol the border between the two Americas. We have that so that the rest of us dont have to deal with it. Then that situation erupts, and we express our shock and indignation. But if we dont address the anguish of a people, the pain of being a people who built this country through forced labor people say, Im tired of everything being about race. Well, imagine how [expletive] exhausting it is to live that.
</snip>
genxlib
(5,544 posts)This stood out to me
Twenty-four-hour news networks are built for one thing, and thats 9/11. There are very few events that would justify being covered 24 hours a day, seven days a week. So in the absence of urgency, they have to create it. You create urgency through conflict.
It is the basic law of supply and demand. When the demand for news goes up to fill all that time, the value of petty shit "news" goes up to fill the void
Wawannabe
(5,683 posts)Jon Stewart is a blessing to the human race.
I HATE that the human race got CLASSified. Just hate it - and I shouldnt have hate in my heart but when something is SO WRONG, I dont know what emotion is better suited to combat the wrongness.
UTUSN
(70,761 posts)First, when I vaguely became aware of him I just accepted him at face value as a worthy Lib on our side.
*** Then a red flag. Just a puzzlement. I didn't know what to think. When he went on CNN's Crossfire and yakked it up "normally" like in a discussion in between the wingnut (NOVAKula or BowTie CARLSON?) and whoever the Lib was (CARVILLE?). Then out of the blue he lambasted both of them, reprimanding that this kind of Right/Left daily debate (years before "polarization" was named) was killing the country. Soon after that the show was cancelled. I didn't know what to make of it, had at least liked it that there was a Lib voice standing up to whoever the wingnut was.
*** So I never tuned in to his Daily Show "religiously." I really don't care to follow spokespeople who tell us what we already know and what we want to hear (the way the Faux audience wants only to hear what they want). I prefer to do Opposition Research and study the fallacies and b.s. that the enemy crap out, in order to be prepared - "Hold friends close, enemies closer."
*** But then I got seriously turned off when he started "reaching out" to O'REILLY, not really to debate but to make nice, common ground, agree to disagree, crap. Switch-guesting on each other's shows.
*** But this tore it for good: When whackjob BecKKK staged an event, a gathering of wingnuts on the (National Mall?), where he was thought to be convening a wingnut slaughterhouse circus but turned into some kind of "religious" peacemaking can't-we-just-get-along thing for the nation, when even his zombie followers were disappointed he didn't lambaste us Libs and tried to "unify" us all. So what did Jon do? Why, he lassoed the wonderful COLBERT into staging what was supposed to be a Lib counter-event, and staged a post-Hippie "love" fest, with bubbles and love children and - NOT KIDDING: - the two nerdy (can't think of them right now, "is it real" - ***the Myth Busters, just thought of their name) guys, the ones who would explode watermelons. We Libs were just as disappointed as the wingnuts were disappointed with BecKKK.
****
****
So, I concluded (for myself) that he was some kind of Third Way type, like the L.A. Law guy.
Thank Zeus for COLBERT, who is everything STEWART didn't do. I never need to hear from STEWART.