General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohn Roberts Is Done Trusting Donald Trump
https://www.yahoo.com/news/john-roberts-done-trusting-donald-183531912.html(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Chief Justice John Roberts has come to liberals rescue again, this time providing the decisive fifth Supreme Court vote to strike down the Trump administrations rescission of DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
Its morally uplifting that dreamers now wont have to live under threat of deportation; and its unlikely that President Donald Trump will be able to rescind DACA, with new justifications, before he leaves office.
But dont think that Roberts was motivated by any liberal sympathy for dreamers. The best explanation for his ruling is that Roberts is fed up with Donald Trumps disrespect for the rule of law. Now hes standing up for the role of the judicial branch of government in checking careless, lawless action by the executive.
snip
More at the link.
I guess we'll take what we can get. The conservatives we see turn against Trump the better it will be for the country.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Elect Biden, win the Senate, let that old fart, Thomas, retire, and we'll have a functioning Supreme Court.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)Moscow Mitch appointed, they are ALL unqualified.
Kyblue1
(216 posts)But I agree that, at least Congress should increase the size of every federal court by the number appointed by Trump. Biden could then appoint qualified judges.
leftieNanner
(15,115 posts)He doesn't want to be replaced by another RBG.
I am very interested in the ruling on Trump's taxes, if this is true. I can believe that Roberts thinks Trump's push that he is above the law won't sit well. Let's hope so.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I hope Roberts does the right thing.
greenman3610
(3,947 posts)leftieNanner
(15,115 posts)It's a part of this session.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,117 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/01/02/feature/conquerors-of-the-courts/
ProfessorGAC
(65,060 posts)I certainly don't know, but maybe that crowd was too crazy for him.
There's got to be some reason he only kept membership for 2 years.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)to put on some really good multi-faceted discussions. We now have an ACS chapter (new, since Trump), so the Fed Soc role is diminished. I'm grateful for that, but before ACS came to campus a lot of decent law students were members of Fed Soc because they wanted some engagement with constitutional law and it was the only game in town.
ProfessorGAC
(65,060 posts)But, 22 years ago, Roberts was not in college.
He graduated from law school in 1976.
I didn't look up his CV, so I don't know what he was doing in the late 90s.
But, to be in & out of an organization that quickly while already a lawyer/judge for 22 years seems odd.
Maybe I'm making too much of it.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)Since my first thought was that perhaps he was a student member.
Sometimes I forget I didn't attend law school at the normal time - so when I see someone about the same age as me I forget they likely graduated 20 years earlier than I did.
awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)Watch Roberts come to the rescue in future cases.
genxlib
(5,528 posts)I don't think the ruling fixed anything other than say the Trump administration needed to be less incompetent.
There are lots of articles like this one analyzing the ruling.
https://www.vox.com/2020/6/18/21295518/supreme-court-daca-trump-roberts-regents-university-california-homeland-security
And yet, while Regents means that these immigrants are not immediately at risk of deportation, they still must live under a cloud of uncertainty for at least as long as Donald Trump is president. As Chief Justice John Roberts notes in his majority opinion, the dispute before the Court is not whether DHS may rescind DACA. Indeed, all parties agree that it may.
Rather the dispute in Regents is primarily about the procedure the Department of Homeland Security followed when it tried to end DACA. Though Regents concludes that DHS did not follow the proper procedures, nothing prevents the department from trying again.
The best news about this is it allows us time to get the beast out of office before he has a chance to try again.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Before i make that leap
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)...for now, at this moment in history, with the election just ahead of us, the more ways that Trump gets rattled and shaken, the better for everybody. Seems like Trump loves to fly off the rails whenever his feeling are hurt, and having him fly off the rails right now is a very good thing for us.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)mainer
(12,022 posts)During his confirmation hearings, I was told that those who'd clerked with Roberts said he was a reasonable man. It looks like they were right.
Fullduplexxx
(7,864 posts)the chief justice made clear that the decision was based on procedural issues and that the Trump administration could try to redress them.
Trump can fix the procedural issues and sent it back
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)If Trump somehow wins, DACA is done for. So many other things will be too.
Fullduplexxx
(7,864 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,300 posts)that Trump can't be trusted has a severe learning disability.
My apologies to those with severe learning disabilities.
Lonestarblue
(10,011 posts)House Democrats should pass a bill now granting DACA recipients the right to stay here and the right to apply for citizenship. When the Senate votes it down, or Mitch refuses to allow it to come up for a vote, that can be used against them because a large majority of people, even Republicans, support allowing the DACA recipients stay.