General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump states that 99% of corona cases "are totally harmless"
US President Donald Trump claimed without evidence on Saturday that 99% of coronavirus cases "are totally harmless" during remarks on the White House South Lawn, in which he sought to downplay the recent surge of Covid-19 cases.
Now we have tested, almost 40 million people. By so doing, we show cases -- 99% of which are totally harmless -- results that no other country can show because no other country has testing that we have. Not in terms of the numbers, or in terms of the quality, he said, once again also falsely claiming that rising cases are caused by increased testing.
https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-07-05-20-intl/h_2ceb0737c72312d02b410a91b0120825
There have been more than 2.8 million cases of coronavirus in the United States and at least 129,000 people in the United States have died, according to Johns Hopkins Universitys latest tally.
Some people who become ill have only mild symptoms, and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 35% of cases are asymptomatic, but even people with mild or no symptoms can spread the virus to others.
While the World Health Organization has said the global fatality rate is like less than 1%, the WHO also said about 20% of all people who are diagnosed with Cornoavirus aresick enough to need oxygen or hospital care.
The White House has not returned a message seeking comment.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Unfortunately having a moral/ethical center does not allow us to do so
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)safeinOhio
(32,685 posts)tested 3 times in 24 hrs. All three were negative. So, was I counted as one, or three?
indigoth
(137 posts)Since all your tests came back negative, you were likely counted as zero.
progree
(10,908 posts)you stupid orange traitor and psychopath.
One can take this list of countries and sort it by the "Tests/1M pop" column to see a fair comparison between countries
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
The U.S. is number 26 on tests/1M pop, though there's some mini-islands and non-countries ahead of it.
A lot of modern developed countries (I exclude the U.S. from that list given its high population density of idiots and its leadership and policies) have lower cumulative total tests per 1M population than the U.S. simply because they had the problem at crisis levels for a much shorter time than the U.S.
E.g. In 1000's of tests per million population (or equivalently tests per thousand population):
US: 111.6, Italy: 92.6, S. Korea: 25.9
S. Korea got control fairly quickly. Italy took longer but its cases and deaths have long been far below the U.S.'s on a per-capita (and total) cases and deaths basis.
So they haven't needed to do as much testing for as long as the U.S. which is at its worst level ever as far as new cases per day -- about 45% above the old April peak the last time I figured it a couple days ago.
Anyway, widespread testing allows us to see where the hotspots are before they get way out of control. Only literal fuckheads think putting their heads in the sand is a good strategy for fixing the problem.
spanone
(135,838 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)Are either really stupid , or just to lazy to fact check his statements for accuracy.