Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTennessee Republican says he hasn't 'really studied' whether the Civil War was about slavery
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/07/tennessee-republican-says-he-hasnt-really-studied-whether-the-civil-war-was-about-slavery/On Thursday, The Tennesseans Natalie Allison reported that Tennessee state Rep. Mike Sparks, who makes a habit of complaining that young people and journalists dont bother to study history, could not answer a basic question about what the Civil War was fought over.
Was the Civil War about slavery? asked a reporter.
I havent really studied it, said Sparks.
You said you know history! said another reporter.
I just think we need to all study history, said Sparks, still not answering the question. Theres different contexts.
This comes during a debate over whether to remove a bust of Confederate general and suspected Klan leader Nathan Bedford Forrest. Another lawmaker, state Sen. Joey Hensley, defended Forrest, arguing that 3,000 Blacks attended his funeral a common but unproven claim of Confederate sympathizers.
We have an elected official who wont admit that the Civil War was fought over slavery, lectures Black Americans about what they should and shouldnt be protesting, and believes we should keep the bust of the KKKs first Grand Wizard in our state capitol as a symbol of forgiveness, said Brandon Thomas, his Democratic opponent. Its clear that Mike Sparks and the Nathan Bedford Forrest bust are both relics of history that need to be removed from the Tennessee State Capitol.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 858 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tennessee Republican says he hasn't 'really studied' whether the Civil War was about slavery (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Jul 2020
OP
LakeArenal
(28,820 posts)1. That's truly shamefully ignorant.
Nevilledog
(51,122 posts)3. He knows. He doesn't want to say it.
kimbutgar
(21,163 posts)2. I was taught about the civil war in 7th grade in the 60's
I guess he must have missed that in school, or is a lying sack of shite. I suspect the latter.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)4. It was about states' rights
To own slaves.
That's the part i always add to any idiot making the "context" argument.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)8. That part about it being "to own slaves" --
that was about 60% of it. The remaining 40% was the slave owners didn't want Yankee men coming south and screwing the owners' daughters.
brewens
(13,596 posts)5. Not a hell of a lot of studying involved. Just read the articles of secession from the various
Confederate states. The people that left the union tell us why they did it.
https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/reasons-secession#:~:text=Every%20state%20in%20the%20Confederacy%20issued%20an%20%E2%80%9CArticle,which%20explain%20their%20decision%20to%20leave%20the%20Union.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,855 posts)6. For crying out loud, just read the declarations of secession!
He obviously hasn't studied it much at all!
Captain Zero
(6,811 posts)7. Read the first page of Tennessee's Confederate Constitution
And have him get back to us.