General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe coronavirus pandemic could lead to Social Security cuts happening sooner than you think
Social Security benefits are a major source of income for millions of retirees, with around one in five married couples depending on their benefits for at least 90% of their income in retirement, according to the Social Security Administration (SSA).
However, you may not be able to rely on your monthly checks as much as you think in the future. While the program is not going bankrupt or on the verge of collapse, benefit cuts are on the table. And there are a few signs those cuts could occur sooner than expected.
Although current benefits are not at risk of being reduced due to the coronavirus pandemic, COVID-19 could exacerbate Social Securitys problems and result in future cuts.
Mass unemployment could force the SSA to make cuts sooner
Generally, the SSA uses money from payroll taxes to pay out current retirees benefits. However, payroll taxes are no longer enough to continue paying out benefits in full, so the SSA has been forced to tap its two trust funds to cover the deficit. Those funds are quickly running out of money, though, and according to the SSAs most recent projections, theyll be depleted by 2034. If Congress doesnt make any changes before then, payroll taxes will only be enough to cover around 76% of future benefits.
Read more: https://www.gastongazette.com/zz/news/20200716/coronavirus-pandemic-could-lead-to-social-security-cuts-happening-sooner-than-you-think
louis-t
(23,295 posts)Payouts have to be dropping.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,862 posts)some 63 million Americans collect Social Security. Even if every single person who's died so far had been on it, the 140,000 deaths so far are just a drop in the bucket.
Mariana
(14,858 posts)BamaRefugee
(3,483 posts)Never forget that Jared promised "we'll be rockin' by July"!
Still 17 glorious days of recovery to go!
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)I forget what exactly he has in mind, but every greedy bastard looks at those funds and licks their lips.
sheshe2
(83,792 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,076 posts)This an opinion piece not fact.
They have 14 years, per this, to figure out revenue increases. (Eliminate the cap?!?!?)
It's a tenuous position based upon an opinion that the only option is cuts.
It strikes me as fear mongering to sell subscriptions.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)Doremus
(7,261 posts)Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Gas has risen almost 80 cents per gallon from it's low. Everything is MORE when food shopping. BULLSHIT...take $100 BILLION or more from the Pentagon budget for the Military Industrial Complex.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)Currently, we pay SS tax on the first $138,000 in income. After that, the rate drops to 0%.
What that means is that the 97% of Americans who make under $138,000 pay SS taxes on 100% of their income, while a person earning $1,380,000 a year pays SS tax on only 10% of their income.