Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,740 posts)
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 11:48 AM Jul 2020

Thousands more satellites could soon be launched into space. Can the federal government keep up?

In a bold move two years ago, the White House issued a directive that would make the Commerce Department a traffic cop in space, giving it the authority to establish rules of the road for the rapidly growing number of satellites in orbit in hopes that it will prevent collisions that destroy millions of dollars worth of hardware and leave behind dangerous clouds of debris.

In a speech, Vice President Pence hailed the effort, saying “President Trump knows that a stable and orderly space environment is critical to the strength of our economy and the resilience of our national security systems.”

But since then, the directive, known as Space Policy Directive-3, has gone nowhere, mired in a Washington bureaucratic battle over which agency would be best suited for the mission. The Trump administration argues that the Commerce Department is best placed to foster the growing commercial space industry — including satellite servicing, manufacturing, space tourism and more — while taking advantage of new technology to track items in orbit.

Some members of Congress think, however, that the responsibility should go to the Federal Aviation Administration instead, extending that agency’s jurisdiction from the skies to space.

The impasse has left the Pentagon to not only track space debris and satellites but also warn governments and private companies around the world of potential collision, as it has done for years. It’s a job it doesn’t want — and that the White House doesn’t want it to have.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/07/23/satellites-collisions-tracking-space/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thousands more satellites could soon be launched into space. Can the federal government keep up? (Original Post) Zorro Jul 2020 OP
Astronomers: "Elon Musk is a dick." LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jul 2020 #1
Those f'ing pieces of shit need to come down. ...nt 2naSalit Jul 2020 #3
It will provide internet access to many rural areas. You can't stop progress. nt USALiberal Jul 2020 #4
The Kessler syndrome LastDemocratInSC Jul 2020 #2
1. Astronomers: "Elon Musk is a dick."
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 12:09 PM
Jul 2020


Here's a photo of the night sky marred by Musk's Starlink satellites

Soon, Earth may be blanketed by tens of thousands of satellites, and they’ll greatly outnumber the approximately 9,000 stars that are visible to an unaided human eye.

This is not some distant threat. It’s already happening. SpaceX has already put 240 of these small satellites, collectively called Starlink, in the sky. Sixty were launched this week. That will be followed by more launches, possibly every two weeks.

In all, the company has approval from the Federal Communications Commission to launch 12,000 satellites, and Musk is seeking approval to launch 30,000 more.

LastDemocratInSC

(3,647 posts)
2. The Kessler syndrome
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 12:52 PM
Jul 2020

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome

"The Kessler syndrome (also called the Kessler effect,[1][2] collisional cascading, or ablation cascade), proposed by NASA scientist Donald J. Kessler in 1978, is a theoretical scenario in which the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) due to space pollution is high enough that collisions between objects could cause a cascade in which each collision generates space debris that increases the likelihood of further collisions.[3] One implication is that the distribution of debris in orbit could render space activities and the use of satellites in specific orbital ranges difficult for many generations.[3]".
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thousands more satellites...