General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe problem with Trump's strange denial in his new golf scandal
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/problem-trump-s-strange-denial-his-new-golf-scandal-n1234680?icid=recommendedThe problem with Trump's strange denial in his new golf scandal
Trump appears to have used government personnel to direct foreign money into one of his own struggling businesses. Even his denial reeks of corruption.
Some of Donald Trump's scandals are complex and take time to disentangle. The new British Open scandal is striking in its simplicity.
The New York Times reported this week that the president urged his ambassador to the U.K. to try to get British officials to steer a lucrative golf tournament to the Trump Turnberry resort in Scotland, one of the president's struggling businesses. The reporting is very easy to believe, not only because of Trump's routine corruption, but also because the ambassador, billionaire donor Woody Johnson, apparently told several colleagues about the president's request, which he acted on.
In case there were any lingering doubts, career diplomat Lewis Lukens, Johnson's deputy in London, confirmed that he warned the ambassador that pressing British officials to boost Trump's private business would be unethical. (Lukens was later fired.)
Initially, the White House had literally nothing to say about the controversy, which was notable in its own right, but at yesterday's press briefing, a reporter specifically asked the president whether he asked Johnson to do this. Trump replied:
"No, I never spoke to Woody Johnson about that, about Turnberry. Turnberry is a highly respected course, as you know, one of the best in the world. And I read a story about it today and I had never, I never spoke to Woody Johnson about doing that. No."
First, there's ample reason to believe Trump's denial is a lie. After all, there's no reason for Johnson, the president's financial supporter and handpicked ambassador, to make this up.
Second, even the denial reeks of corruption. In response to a question about misusing his office to help his business, the president used the White House podium to praise and promote his business.
What's more, if Trump is under the impression that his denial will help make the questions go away, he's likely to be disappointed. Keep in mind that in the NYT's initial reporting we learned that complaints were raised with the State Departments Office of the Inspector General last fall. The article added, "The findings were submitted in February, and the complaints are expected to be included, according to one of the investigators. It is not clear why the review has not been made public."
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/problem-trump-s-strange-denial-his-new-golf-scandal-n1234680?icid=recommended
Vinca
(50,302 posts)"I never met the woman." "I've never done business with anyone by that name." "I don't know what Michael Cohen does on his own." Etc., etc., etc.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)An odd exception
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)couldn't say he didn't know her, there's like 90 kajillion Pics of them together
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,160 posts)He warned that if the ambassador pursued Trump's mission, it would be unethical.
Official press releases during that time stated that Lukens was let go because he mentioned Obama during a speech to students. That wasn't the reason. He was fired in retaliation for not aiding and abetting Johnson.
mgardener
(1,817 posts)Even being fired for mentioning POTUS OBAMA seems fishy.
djacq
(1,634 posts)safeinOhio
(32,714 posts)and the bring back everyone from before tRump.
GeorgeGist
(25,322 posts)about bounties on American heads?
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Cozmo
(1,402 posts)Granted, the Democrats have a lot on their plates right now, but this particular travesty cannot be swept under the rug like yesterday's bad news. Any suggestions?
Buns_of_Fire
(17,192 posts)Oh, I think I could hazard a guess or two...
calimary
(81,440 posts)Its not clear why the review has not been made public?
WTF?????
Now why the hell does anyone possibly think it would not be made public??? With THIS guy? And THIS sneaky-ass, scheming, mendacious, malevolent regime of his???
Because theyre fucking trying to fucking HIDE something!!! Because its something BAD (illegal, immoral, unethical, unconstitutional, somehow benefiting the Russians or Trumps pockets or both)!!!
Yeehah
(4,589 posts)is a goddamned idiot.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,109 posts)Cha
(297,531 posts)Bloated ASSFACE
Blue Owl
(50,489 posts)Chapter 4: Deny Everything