Douche bank has complied with the subpoena

[5X]

Link to tweet

?s=20

[cally]

1. NY has docs

Here’s the answer:

Deutsche Bank complied with the subpoena. Over a period of months last year, it provided Mr. Vance’s office with detailed records, including financial statements and other materials that Mr. Trump had provided to the bank as he sought loans, according to two of the people familiar with the inquiry.


Goes on to say early phase of investigation

[5X]

2. Yes, they turned over documents to NY prosecutor.

[Nevilledog]

4. Worth a read. Sounds like they've turned over quite a bit.

Not tax returns......yet.

[SheltieLover]

3. Which subpoena?

[yellowcanine]

5. This one. Vance subpoena for Trump financial documents.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213860077

[SheltieLover]

7. Awesome!

Ty!!!

[hlthe2b]

6. WOW WOW WOW WOW WOW!!!!

(must not get TOO excited)...

[SheltieLover]

9. 🤣🤣🤣

Shitler is going to be tweeting! 🤣

[magicarpet]

8. Oh Boy,... will King Orange-itang's house of cards fall,...

.... just before the November 3 election ?
Splat !

[SheltieLover]

10. 🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞

I don't feel repukes want him as nominee tbh. Just a feeling. Hopefully NY will locck his nasty fat ass up & toss the key for life! 👍

[onetexan]

11. August Surprise!!

JUSTICE WILL BE SERVED!!

[Nexus2]

12. The Congressional Subpoena was shot down IIRC?

[stillcool]

14. kicked back to the lower courts

Supreme Court declines to give Congress access to Trump financial records for now
BY MELISSA QUINN

UPDATED ON: JULY 9, 2020 / 9:23 PM / CBS NEWS
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-trump-congress-subpoenas-financial-records-tax-returns/

Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday sent the legal battle between President Trump and a trio of Democrat-led House committees seeking troves of his financial records back to the lower courts, effectively ensuring the documents will remain out of public view until after the November presidential election.


The court ruled 7-2 in tossing out lower court rulings in favor of House Democrats who issued subpoenas to Mazars USA, Mr. Trump's longtime account firm, for his business records, and two banks, Deutsche Bank and Capital One, and kicking the case back to the lower courts. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the ruling.

"When Congress seeks information 'needed for intelligent legislative action,' it 'unquestionably' remains 'the duty of all citizens to cooperate,'" Roberts wrote for the court. "Congressional subpoenas for information from the president, however, implicate special concerns regarding the separation of powers. The courts below did not take adequate account of those concerns."

https://www.lawfareblog.com/supreme-court-rules-trump-subpoena-cases

[SergeStorms]

18. The Congressional subpoena was too far reaching...

according to Maddow's show tonight. They wanted financial information from the demon spawn of Trump as well, as well as Kushner. NY Manhattan District Attorney's was more defined, requesting Fat Donny's only.

[stillcool]

19. yeah...but then I heard/read somewhere...

that the Dems didn't go big enough. Always something. But then I also read that Vance's subpoena was far reaching, and covers decades of his financial crap.

[SergeStorms]

20. Who knows for sure?

Until we see it in black and white it's all speculation, I guess, even for the media.

[CanonRay]

13. Tweet rage storm in 3...2...1...

[malaise]

15. That's tomorrow's NY Attorney General Press Conference

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!

[SergeStorms]

16. Let the light shine in!

It's about time the disinfecting light-of-day finally shines on the dirty dealings of Don Orangebaloney. Go get him, NEW YORK!

[miyazaki]

17. Douche Bank ftw.