Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(49,041 posts)
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 09:26 PM Sep 2012

John Nichols, The Nation: Elizabeth Warren Wins the 'Which Side Are You On?' Debate

http://www.thenation.com/blog/170079/elizabeth-warren-wins-which-side-are-you-debate

An overbearing and at times ridiculously aggressive Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown came across as a desperate man Thursday night, as he attempted to gain the upper hand not just in the first debate of this year's most closely-watched U.S. Senate race but the contest itself.

Brown literally attacked Elizabeth Warren, his Democratic challenger, from start to finish.

Warren, unruffled and showing the confidence of a woman who has moved ahead of Brown in most recent polls, sometimes rolled her eyes or shook her head in disappointment. She made her points about economic injustice and Wall Street wrongdoing, about holding corporations to account and establishing far tax policies, about relieving the crushing burden of student-loan debt and about making sure that Mitt Romney and a Republican Senate do not fill the next vacancies on the U.S. Supreme Court. Brown could attack all he wanted, but the senator who joined fellow Republicans in trying to block President Obama's nomination of Elena Kagen to the high court could not change the reality that Warren was right when she said: “This really may be the race for the control of the Senate and the Supreme Court may hang in the balance."
Warren was smooth and effective, "explaining things" with the same confidence that Bill Clinton displayed in Charlotte. It wasn't always easy; as Brown interrupted at every opportunity -- to accrue Warren of lying about her heritage, of attacking asbestos victims, of starting Occupy Wall Street.

But Warren never sweated it. She knew she had the winning hand.

-snip-
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Nichols, The Nation: Elizabeth Warren Wins the 'Which Side Are You On?' Debate (Original Post) highplainsdem Sep 2012 OP
Good for her..... russspeakeasy Sep 2012 #1
I think your link is broken--but this one works: demwing Sep 2012 #2
Thank you, demwing. :) pacalo Sep 2012 #4
Thanks. The site changed the link (from 170078 to 170079) after I posted this. I'd highplainsdem Sep 2012 #5
Please check the link; it didn't work for me. pacalo Sep 2012 #3
See reply 5 above, and the OP -- the site changed the link, and I've now corrected the OP. highplainsdem Sep 2012 #6
Thanks for the correction & for posting Nichols' article. It's a great read. pacalo Sep 2012 #8
You're welcome! highplainsdem Sep 2012 #9
Thanks for the article, highplainsdem.. Cha Sep 2012 #7
"Professor Warren" Took Snotty Scotty to School! AnnieBW Sep 2012 #10

highplainsdem

(49,041 posts)
5. Thanks. The site changed the link (from 170078 to 170079) after I posted this. I'd
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 09:43 PM
Sep 2012

copied the original link directly from the address bar.

I've edited the OP to include the new link.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
3. Please check the link; it didn't work for me.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 09:40 PM
Sep 2012

Scott Brown came across as snarky & desperate to me, too. The choice couldn't be clearer with Elizabeth Warren as a candidate against him. I think Brown's desperate demeanor during the debate reveals that he knows it, too.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Nichols, The Nation:...