Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe 'Blue Shift' Will Decide the Election
Something fundamental has changed about the ways Americans vote.https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/08/brace-blue-shift/615097/
As polling places closed on November 6, 2018, the expected blue wave looked more like a ripple. Not only had some of the highest-profile Democratic candidates lost, but the partys gains in the House and the Senate looked smaller than anticipated. The wave, it turned out, simply hadnt crested yet. Over the ensuing weeks, as more ballots were counted, Democrats kept winning raceseventually netting 41 House seats. In Arizona, the Republican Martha McSally conceded the Senate race to the Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, who picked up more than 70,000 votes in postElection Day counting. Democrats narrowed deficits in races in Florida and Georgia too. Republicans were stunned. California just defies logic to me, then-Speaker Paul Ryan said in late November. We were only down 26 seats the night of the election and three weeks later, we lost basically every contested California race.
This sort of late-breaking Democratic vote is the new, though still underappreciated, normal in national elections. Americans have become accustomed to knowing who won our elections promptly, but there are many legitimate votes that are not counted immediately every election year. For reasons that are not totally understood by election observers, these votes tend to be heavily Democratic, leading results to tilt toward Democrats as more of them are counted, in what has become known as the blue shift. In most cases, the blue shift is relatively inconsequential, changing final vote counts but not results. But in others, as in 2018, it can materially change the outcome. Although it is slowly dawning on the press and the electorate that Election Day will be more like Election Week or Election Month this year, thanks to coronavirus-related complications, the blue shift remains obscure. But the effect could be much larger and far more consequential in 2020, as Democrats embrace voting by mail more enthusiastically than Republicans. If the public isnt prepared to wait patiently for the final results, and if politicians cynically exploit the shifting tallies to cast doubt on the integrity of the vote, the results could be catastrophic.
Imagine that as November 3, 2020, ticks away, President Donald Trump holds a small lead in one or more key states such as Pennsylvaniaperhaps 10,000 or 20,000 votesand seems to have enough states in his column to eke out an Electoral College win. Trump declares victory, taunts Joe Biden, and prepares for a second term. But the reported results on Election Night omit tens of thousands of votes, including provisional ballots and uncounted mail-in votes. Over the coming days, as those votes are counted, Trumps lead dwindles and eventually disappears. By the end of the week or early the next, Biden emerges as the clear victor in Pennsylvaniaand with that win, captures the race for the presidency. If thats how things unfold, Trump is unlikely to take defeat snatched from the jaws of victory graciously. He has already spent months attempting to delegitimize the election system. So imagine that he instead cries fraud and insists hes the target of a criminal Democratic coup. What if he encourages his supporters to take to the streets, where there are violent clashes between partisans? He might even urge the Republican-led Pennsylvania General Assembly to submit a slate of Trump-backing electors, citing the Election Day returns, even if the full tally clearly shows Keystone State voters chose Biden.
The hypothetical of a blue shift reversing the early projected winner is the nightmare scenario, according to the election-law expert Rick Hasen. Either Trump or Biden could win by a sufficient margin to make the result clear on Election Night; its also possible that multiple states might see a decisive postNovember 3 blue shift, creating even more chaos. You dont need to worry about Russia, Edward Foley, a law professor at Ohio State, told me. Simply anxiety over a blue shift and willingness to litigate about it and fight about it could cause a raging contestation over a presidential election. The blue shift is the product of two major developments in elections over the past 70 years. First, Americans began to expect that they would have results on Election Night itself. In the first national elections, it was impossible to gather results from many different jurisdictions promptly, and even then, there was no way to instantaneously deliver the results to the public. Electronic communications began to change that. Abraham Lincoln learned hed won in 1860 by staking out the telegraph office until the wee hours of the morning. But when the races were close, or the votes were slow to be tallied, even instantaneous communications couldnt deliver a result that hadnt yet been determined. Nearly a century after Lincoln, in 1948, CBS Newss Edward Murrow signed off without being able to give the result of the close election between Harry Truman and Thomas Dewey. (The Chicago Daily Tribune was not so patient.)
snip
much more at the top link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 3232 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 'Blue Shift' Will Decide the Election (Original Post)
Celerity
Aug 2020
OP
Sober analysis gives hope but warns if election is close, results won't be known that night
Fiendish Thingy
Aug 2020
#1
I've heard Rachel and a few others on MSNBC foreshadow that results may not be known that eve nt
Fiendish Thingy
Aug 2020
#6
Fiendish Thingy
(15,623 posts)1. Sober analysis gives hope but warns if election is close, results won't be known that night
Lets hope it isnt so close The networks cant call it for Biden- Ill be pleased if the Blue Shift simply turns a clear Biden victory into a historic landslide.
Squinch
(50,955 posts)3. This. Because otherwise we are in for a brawl, and they cheat and we don't.
I'm voting in person.
peggysue2
(10,830 posts)4. x1000!
A massive, indisputable Biden win will eliminate the nightmare scenarios we're all nervously reflecting on. The bigger the numbers, the better.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)5. Some needs to tell the networks
Their old models aren't going to work well this time around. It will be unknown for days how many ballots were even cast. Nate Silver probably needs to do some work here to warn the public and the press about the nature of the delay.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,623 posts)6. I've heard Rachel and a few others on MSNBC foreshadow that results may not be known that eve nt
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)2. That should be correct
I've never worried about theft until this cycle, with the USPS situation.