Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 03:48 PM Jan 2012

The Political Compass sweet spot

There are zillions of political compass representations of leaders, past and present. In the US or Europe sucessful leaders are almost invariably bunched together in the autoritarian-right quadrant. Even the fringe elements of what we consider to be the entirety of the practical political landscape are more or less in line with the broad concensus.

Is this a defect in the political compass method or does it represent something real?




www.politicalcompass.org/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
2. An interesting question
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 04:42 PM
Jan 2012

I doubt an accurate answer can be had without knowing a large enough sample of average folk.

Some of the greatest leaders were in the lower left quadrant. Gandhi is one who comes to mind. I'm not sure where MLK and JFK were, I suspect JFK would be upper right.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
3. Somewhat real.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 04:56 PM
Jan 2012

The mainstream US political spectrum is very narrow when you compare it to the whole world. And not only the whole world but also back in time. So there is some truth in the little red and blue clusters for Dems and GOPs.






But I also think this compass has a couple blind spots.
It doesn't do a good job distinguishing between mixed economy social democrats vs. the proponents of private profit.
As you can see here where they have UK Labour just a couple squares from Adolf Hitler and the BNP:
http://www.politicalcompass.org/ukparties2010

Any political compass is going to be flawed because you can't quantify some peoples beliefs so easily (Ron Paul for example).
Some people are just harder to fit in a neat box.

 

jody

(26,624 posts)
4. Source might be questionable but IMO the corporate party finances Dem & Rep candidates
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 04:57 PM
Jan 2012

to keep voters fighting over divisive, polarizing issues while they pass laws with bipartisan support that tighten their stranglehold on our government. I'm not surprised that Obama and the other blue dots are in the same quadrant with Gingrich and the other red dots.

Duer 157099

(17,742 posts)
5. I've taken that test many times over the years and
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 05:00 PM
Jan 2012

consistently end up in the lower lower left left quadrant.

I've always wondered why so many are elsewhere.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
6. One area of the chart is actually impossible
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 05:02 PM
Jan 2012

No political system could be in the very lower left corner because a certain level of authority is required to enforce ultimate economic leftism. Human beings will strive to have more and, whatever the legal status of property, will not always give up what they aquire.

That said, I am proud to consider myself somewhere in the left-libertarian quadrant.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
7. Crazy freezers would not put Mitt so high in the right hand top corner
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 05:05 PM
Jan 2012

Though the Obama/Biden/Edwards/Clinton cluster - why don't they get to be farther down? What standards are they using for a social libertarian? All are pro-choice, for instance.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
9. That is all they have to hang their hats on and that might be limited to those who can self pay
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 05:44 PM
Jan 2012

for some.

Between mediocre and dicey on most rights, and none too slow to error on the side of the state.

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
8. Better question
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 05:09 PM
Jan 2012

How are those leaders being judged, on performance or rhetoric? And who is evaluating those criteria?

This does go to method, but it's more explicit in asking the question.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
10. A relatively conservative coworker took the test and came in dead center.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 05:53 PM
Jan 2012

He's a Christian, conservative, very pro-life, etc.

All of the liberals in my office came up far left and social libertarian of Dennis Kuchnich.

I think there's a slight bias as far as where the center point is, but it is a good comparative tool between friends, maybe not politicians.

Telly Savalas

(9,841 posts)
11. Political compasses are fucking stupid
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 06:06 PM
Jan 2012

The notion that one can meaningfully distill a person's political philosophy into 2 numbers is just dumb.

And even if there was any value in such oversimplification, the execution of this idea is completely arbitrary: depending on the issues/questions selected and the scoring/weighting of these issues, one can make the compass say anything they want. Just because I can put some random shit in Excel doesn't make Barack Obama a right wing fascist or Michele Bachmann a socialist.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Political Compass swe...