General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnyone an APP builder? Design an APP in the phones that take temperatures
It would be a HIT
cayugafalls
(5,641 posts)Not sure of any that have that capability right now.
It would be cool though.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,716 posts)Body temperature is a vital sign that is monitored continually in hospitals, where it can be an invaluable window into how a patient is faring. But screening groups of people for the coronavirus is a different matter, and that is whats happening now. Employers around the United States are attempting to order daily temperature checks to determine who is allowed to enter an office and do their job. As you noticed, access to courts may be based on this test. Fever screens have even been implicated in many plans to open schools: New York Citys Department of Education announced last week that kids would be randomly screened before being allowed to enter school buildings, despite the fact that kids with the virus rarely develop fevers...
Temperature checks may be useful in specific circumstances, as opposed to mass fishing expeditions. But people who are found to have a fever are likely being told what they already know. When fevers do come on, people typically already feel ill. Theyre likely to also have a cough, shortness of breath, or other symptoms. They should have had access to a proper test that would tell them if they had the virus. They should have been able to seek medical attention. They should have been able to isolate at home.
The real spirit of mass temperature checks, as theyre currently being used, is punitive. If, amid the many false positives and false negatives, fever screening does successfully catch a few sick people who went out anyway, then this may be a symptom of a societal ill. Feverish people are not likely venturing out because they have a death wish or want to infect others; theyre likely doing it because they cant afford to stay home, or they need to pick up their kids, or they dont have sick leave. The solution to this isnt to pour more resources into infrared cameras in an attempt to detect and detain these people. Its to put those resources into taking care of them in the first place.
AllaN01Bear
(18,242 posts)and a laptop to do that .
Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)Could easily create a piece of hardware that does that and interfaces to the phone. Could be done wirelessly with bluetooth or wifi, or could use the audio jack or something to communicate. I'm willing to bet that already exists. Let me go check
Here's an example
https://www.amazon.com/Instant-Non-Contact-Thermometer-Fever-Children/dp/B07XPH8D6Z
That may defeat the purpose of what you're going for, though.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)I couldn't imagine it adding much more to the total cost of the phone. A few years back I built one on a breadboard for fun, and I think for all the components I paid less than $10. That included the cost of the microprocessor too.
thinkingagain
(906 posts)Thought of the idea also. Not sure of how it could be done. Some smart watches do it.
The one thing Ive noticed with those temp checks. I normally have a low temp but if your in a car on a hot day and go on a place then they use one of those contactless tempature scans my tempature is higher. Plus the watch I had did also. So can we trust these tempature that are being taken?
Now I know wait like 5mins after being in the warm car.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)kids not for 3 more weeks
nuxvomica
(12,426 posts)I forget what it's called but it has a thermometer that Bluetooths to the phone, and from there the data goes to a central location where they produce maps of temperature increases as a way to track COVID-19 spreads.