General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have a question for William Barr
I don't understand why this isn't a huge story. Barr clearly deliberately lied on his Senate Judiciary confirmation questionnaire.
Barr wrote: "I have not served in the U.S. Military. I was born in 1950 and was not required to register for selective service."
He not only registered (links to the original docs in the Twitter thread), but he got 6 deferments, including after he finished undergrad. Something really stinks here. It seems like such a small thing to lie about. Why?? From all the replies in the thread, it's clear that an 18-year-old in 1968 would have been very much affected by the process of registering for the draft! It's apparently not something one would forget. So why lie about this? Why?
Link to tweet
pfitz59
(10,388 posts)Yellow to the bone
intrepidity
(7,335 posts)Seems like that should matter.
Me.
(35,454 posts)and he was certainly eligible for the Vietnam War draft
dchill
(38,520 posts)I suspect something larger, though.
intrepidity
(7,335 posts)There are some strange inconsistencies, such as it listing him as a 6-foot 175-lb blonde. And, not to be sexist or anything, but the signature looks like it belongs to a girl .. (heh)
Laelth
(32,017 posts)It may not be a lie when he says he wasnt required to register for selective service. He doesnt say why he wasnt required to register, but he registered anyway, and thats how he got six deferments.
-Laelth
intrepidity
(7,335 posts)would have been exempt from registering?
Laelth
(32,017 posts)There are always exceptions.
I merely note that Barrs statement, quoted in the OP, is sophisticated legalese that, while perhaps truthful, disguises the truth of his six deferments.
-Laelth
intrepidity
(7,335 posts)Always exceptions? I would like to see one, for this case. It doesn't seem like an area with exceptions on the front-end, to me.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
intrepidity
(7,335 posts)It *would* explain his weasel words. It's just such a long-shot, IMHO.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)WAY not to have to register for the draft. He's a liar, just like his boss.
HotTeaBag
(1,206 posts)He probably registered in order to 'legally' get the deferments, otherwise he may have run the risk of being drafted.
csziggy
(34,137 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Barr#Early_career
The cite for that information is Barr, William P. (February 14, 2019). "William Barr Senate Questionnaire Answers" (PDF). Nominations | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/William%20Barr%20Senate%20Questionnaire%20(PUBLIC).pdf
I expect that the CIA could consider him exempt from registration.
intrepidity
(7,335 posts)csziggy
(34,137 posts)Maybe that was an honest student deferral? That would NOT explain why he would not be required to register, though. Hmmmmm...
intrepidity
(7,335 posts)My understanding was that no deferrals for grad school, though.
Something shady goin on here. It's Bill Barr, afterall.
spanone
(135,862 posts)In 1968, the Vietnam war was BLAZING....you didn't forget going to the registration office.
intrepidity
(7,335 posts)that would allow one to not register? Since you were a contemporary...