General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'It's a F------ Mess': How and Why Football Conferences Are Arriving at Opposing Medical Conclusions
https://www.si.com/college/2020/08/14/ncaa-football-covid-medical-experts-big-ten-pac-12"So whats the answer to that question? There isnt one. There are several. Why two medical boards ruled quite the exact opposite of others, with the same data, in the same country, about the same sport, while performing the same protocols, is not easily explained.
In such a vast nation with differing cultural ideals and local policies, factors include regionalization and politicization. But one of the most pertinent answers to the question? Risk tolerance.
The other conferences all understand there is a high risk, says Boris Lushniak, a member of the Big Tens COVID-19 advisory group and squarely in the camp against playing a fall season. They think they can deal with it. Do they have the answer to the unknowns? They really dont, which means its on the spectrum of risk-taking behavior.
I cant tell people, You are doing the wrong thing. What I can tell people is, Youre doing a risky thing.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)The Big Ten generally has universities that care much more about player health, versus profits on football games. Same goes for the MAC, Big East and PAC-12.
If Nebraska and Iowa try to play an independent fall schedule, then just based on ethics, they should be kicked out of the Big Ten.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)If you look at this in light of what universities were educating Black people during segregation (Big Ten, Ivy, Big East), the situation comes up clear, those schools simply have a definite moral compass that they observe.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)I am not surprised with Nebraska, as its attitude is still much like the conference it left. The Big 12.
I am really saddened that Iowa was squawking. I expected more from them than that as a long time Big Ten school AND the major medical research university that it is.
pstokely
(10,530 posts)and once again, N is for Knowledge
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)southern universities would keep playing. I expected that. The only thing that would stop their season is if a White kid falls dead from COVID19 complications on the playing or practice field, I am afraid that they would explain away an African American, American Indian or Hispanic kid falling dead and keep playing their season.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)Very clearly.
Makes me believe even more that Abraham Lincoln made a mistake keeping the union together.
Instead he should have negotiated a union with Canada for the northern states.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)We are basically no longer a unified country. But the issue of enslavement of human beings was worth fighting to end.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)The sanctions worked on apartheid South Africa. Also we could have allowed immigration northward for former slaves.
However, we cannot change the past, but we sure as hell change the future.
I need to remind myself of that.
pstokely
(10,530 posts)and not in prayers to the white Christian god
roamer65
(36,747 posts)oswaldactedalone
(3,491 posts)Number 2 sport behind college hoops and I dont think any teams should be playing this season. The Pac-12, the Big Ten, and other conferences/schools not playing made the right call. Im still not convinced there will be games this fall. Somebody needs to advise these universities about the crazy risks they are taking.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)They asked people on the streets what they thought of the Big Ten delaying fall sports.
NOT ONE said it was a bad idea. Most said that they will miss them, BUT it is the right decision.
They definitely made the right call, as you mention.
pstokely
(10,530 posts)SEC isn't scheduled to start it's conference only season until Sept 26, Ivy League cancelled early since they have huge endowments not related to sports, and Ivy League sports don't even have huge TV deals, most places in the SEC are scheduled to start at least some in person classes soon and they've already begun moving in students into the dorms, most in the Pac12 will be going mostly remote
BGBD
(3,282 posts)can be in class, then they can play football.
Having 30,000 kids and 5-10k staff on campus is significantly more dangerous than playing a football game in the age of COVID. IF they are serious about the safety of students (including players) they could go to fully online delivery.
Also, before we start casting the Big 10 as the moral compass of Universities let's not forget that Penn State, Ohio State, and Michigan State have ALL been cool with members of their athletic department raping kids in their facilities.
Iggo
(47,563 posts)And they'll say exactly what you did: If it's safe for the rest of the students, it's safe to play football.
BGBD
(3,282 posts)that they are already bringing all of the student back. Ohio State has already moved their students in.
https://www.dispatch.com/news/20200812/ohio-state-move-in-day-comes-with-lots-of-questions-no-football
Would you like to try again?
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)Your post is laughable, and apologist.
BGBD
(3,282 posts)Look at Michigan State. It enrolls 50,000 students and only ~2k are exclusively online. They also have about 7k staff on campus.
https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/edu/171100/michigan-state-university/enrollment/
MSU has 16k students live on campus alone. Major college campuses are small cities.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,494 posts)Vast policy inconsistencies resulting in more cases and deaths from coast-to-coast and border-to-border....
usajumpedtheshark
(672 posts)Heat stroke, early onset degenerative joint disease, concussions the list goes on. I was in sports medicine for 20 years and whenever a coach asked me how an athlete was what they really wanted to know was when could the athlete start practicing again. They didn't really care the athlete's mental and emotional state.
pstokely
(10,530 posts)a lot of them probably fear losing those if they don't play