Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UpInArms

(51,284 posts)
Sun Aug 16, 2020, 10:49 AM Aug 2020

Pandemic denial: Why some people can't accept Covid-19's realities

When adults have been raised in an environment where unfounded beliefs were a part of their upbringing, they are much more likely to believe in conspiracy theories and hoaxes. They also tend to make decisions based on hunches and preconceived ideas and biases as opposed to using factual information.


Much more at link:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/16/health/pandemic-covid-19-denial-mental-health-wellness/index.html
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pandemic denial: Why some people can't accept Covid-19's realities (Original Post) UpInArms Aug 2020 OP
Also, they are unable to accept their own vulnerability. It's too frightening. enough Aug 2020 #1
Great article iamateacher Aug 2020 #2
Explains religion. lindysalsagal Aug 2020 #7
Accepting or facing reality is often terribly difficult for some, interrupting their 42bambi Aug 2020 #3
A couple of other reasons not mentioned in the article. PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2020 #4
+1, otherwise it looks like if a person is rich etc they don't die. In 1918 it was similar a base .. uponit7771 Aug 2020 #6
No one's saying what killed frump's brother, yet. lindysalsagal Aug 2020 #8
The fact that Robert Trump's cause of death PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2020 #10
More emphasis on personal knowledge zipplewrath Aug 2020 #5
Your closed-bubble theory seems true to me. lindysalsagal Aug 2020 #9

enough

(13,262 posts)
1. Also, they are unable to accept their own vulnerability. It's too frightening.
Sun Aug 16, 2020, 11:08 AM
Aug 2020

That’s why they have to constantly assert toughness. It’s fear.

42bambi

(1,753 posts)
3. Accepting or facing reality is often terribly difficult for some, interrupting their
Sun Aug 16, 2020, 11:39 AM
Aug 2020

quiet and perfect little utopia. Conspiracy theories are simple and takes no curiosity. It's so much easier for them to ignore reality, having no interest or desire to change. And now with Qanon - how do we address that?

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,873 posts)
4. A couple of other reasons not mentioned in the article.
Sun Aug 16, 2020, 12:35 PM
Aug 2020

First off is that a lot of people really do not personally know someone who has died from this.

Another is, and this is going to sound insensitive, but please bear with me, not enough celebrities of any sort have gotten sick and died with this. Herman Cain seems to be the highest profile person so far, but until a whole bunch more household names at the very least get sick, it will remain all too easy to keep on thinking this doesn't matter, isn't important to me.

Yes, I know Tom Hanks and his wife got it. Happily, they both recovered quite nicely. A handful of others have gotten it, and any number of people have tested positive, which isn't always the same as getting sick.

Nope, what is needed is for this disease to take out several high profile people. Please don't think I'm actively wishing this on anyone. Other than perhaps those who continue to believe it's a hoax. Those people I don't care so much about. But if Famous Actors 1,2, and 3 were struck down, if Well-Known Rock Stars 4, 5, and 6, and maybe a handful of international jet-set celebrities were to get this, maybe then more people would finally understand how serious it is. Until then, this remains something that happens at a distance for most of us.

Remember, that while 170,000 dead from this is a high number, it's still a tiny percentage of the population. If I did the division correctly is 0.0005%. Five one hundredths of a percent.

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
6. +1, otherwise it looks like if a person is rich etc they don't die. In 1918 it was similar a base ..
Sun Aug 16, 2020, 01:22 PM
Aug 2020

... ball player that was high profile died of the disease and it got real for a lot of people to wear masks

lindysalsagal

(20,718 posts)
8. No one's saying what killed frump's brother, yet.
Sun Aug 16, 2020, 01:49 PM
Aug 2020

I believe that if it were anything else, they'd be shouting it from the rooftops. "Stroke!" "Heart attack!"

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,873 posts)
10. The fact that Robert Trump's cause of death
Sun Aug 16, 2020, 05:09 PM
Aug 2020

hasn't been made public means pretty much nothing, other than the cause of death hasn't been made public.

I have read more than one news story about someone dying that doesn't say what the cause of death was. Sometimes families want to keep it private.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
5. More emphasis on personal knowledge
Sun Aug 16, 2020, 01:18 PM
Aug 2020

It is true that people tend to put more emphasis and trust in information that they know and understand. So when faced with information to the contrary, that they don't understand, they will tend dismiss the information they don't understand in favor of that which they do. Even more so when such a choice is more favorable to them, or more comforting. It is a problem with highly educated people, especially when information from outside their area of expertise conflicts with information within their expertise. It gets vastly worse with "low information" individuals. It is often reflected in statements such as "I know what I know". They have a very small bubble of knowledge and beliefs, often quite narrow in scope, and it can be nearly impossible to pierce that bubble without direct personal experience.

lindysalsagal

(20,718 posts)
9. Your closed-bubble theory seems true to me.
Sun Aug 16, 2020, 01:52 PM
Aug 2020

They fear and hate the feeling of confusion and lack of understanding so much that they'll go to any length to protect "who I am today" and not allow that to expand or change.

To me, that's the definition of "aggressively stupid." "Willful ignorance" is the more polite way to say it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pandemic denial: Why some...