Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGhislaine Maxwell says trial on Epstein charges threatened by deposition
Source: Reuters
U.S. AUGUST 20, 2020 / 8:29 PM / UPDATED 14 MINUTES AGO
Ghislaine Maxwell says trial on Epstein charges threatened by deposition
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday urged a U.S. appeals court to block the release of a deposition on the grounds it could destroy her chance for a fair trial on criminal charges she aided the late financier Jeffrey Epsteins sexual abuse of girls.
Maxwells deposition was taken in April 2016 for a now-settled civil defamation lawsuit against the British socialite by Virginia Giuffre, who said Epstein kept her as a sex slave with Maxwells assistance.
In a filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan, Maxwells lawyers said a lower court order to unseal the deposition and other documents from that case threatened her constitutional right to a fair trial by an impartial jury.
The order eviscerates the promise of confidentiality on which Maxwell relied, he lawyers said.
If the unsealing order goes into effect, it will forever let the cat out of the bag, they added.
-snip-
Ghislaine Maxwell says trial on Epstein charges threatened by deposition
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Ghislaine Maxwell on Thursday urged a U.S. appeals court to block the release of a deposition on the grounds it could destroy her chance for a fair trial on criminal charges she aided the late financier Jeffrey Epsteins sexual abuse of girls.
Maxwells deposition was taken in April 2016 for a now-settled civil defamation lawsuit against the British socialite by Virginia Giuffre, who said Epstein kept her as a sex slave with Maxwells assistance.
In a filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan, Maxwells lawyers said a lower court order to unseal the deposition and other documents from that case threatened her constitutional right to a fair trial by an impartial jury.
The order eviscerates the promise of confidentiality on which Maxwell relied, he lawyers said.
If the unsealing order goes into effect, it will forever let the cat out of the bag, they added.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-ghislaine-maxwell/ghislaine-maxwell-says-trial-on-epstein-charges-threatened-by-deposition-idUSKBN25H023
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 818 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ghislaine Maxwell says trial on Epstein charges threatened by deposition (Original Post)
Eugene
Aug 2020
OP
Moostache
(9,897 posts)1. Well...only one thing comes to mine immediately after this quote:
If the unsealing order goes into effect, it will forever let the cat out of the bag, they added.
There are just some pussies that should NEVER be grabbed...
Solomon
(12,319 posts)2. Let's see what they do. They had no problem unsealing Bill Cosby's
sealed depositions. (And no - I am not defending Bill Cosby) Just interested in seeing what happens.
Cartaphelius
(868 posts)3. I'm sorry....
so.... she gets away with 2 counts of sex trafficking? How does that make any sense?
An admitted sex trafficker in 2006, roughly, and was still involved with the same crime
until dear Jeffrey's untimely demise. In 2019. A full time sex trafficking criminal should
receive the BENEFIT of sealing of admitted collusion in sex trafficking 13 years ago, WHY?