Santorum is going after ladies who use birth-control, will he also be going after men who

[demtenjeep]

do their own thing? wouldn't spilling seed also be wrong?


And this is the guy who thinks Obama is intrusive because he wants all students to have the opportunity to go to college if they want. He out of all the clown candidates that are left make me sick.

[boston bean]

1. There must be something somewhere in the bible

that says it's ok for men to masturbate.

It's just women that shouldn't, they need a man to take care of that for them, doncha know?

It's a win win all the way around for the man!

[moriah]

3. Thought it was the reverse, since women's ovulation isn't dependent on orgasm...

... Tho if he wanted to really be strict about making sex as pro-creative as they could, he ought to make giving an orgasm to a woman mandatory. If she is ovulating, the orgasm makes her suck the sperm up insider her better.

now THAT'S a regulation I could go along with!

[boston bean]

11. Well...

that would only be if you didn't have to return the favor?

[moriah]

17. Since the spasms mechanically go on quite awhile after the orgasm for the ladies...

... then yeah, ours could come first. No pun intended.

But unless his swimmers are quite ... adept, he'd have to eventually for it to be pro-creative. (Yeah, I know it's possible for sperm to be in pre-ejaculate... but not likely.)

[boston bean]

23. I don't really think it has much to do with pro-creation

at least in santorums head. he is all about the control and him feeling good. Know what I mean!

[moriah]

31. Well, I'm going with the whole *theory* of sex in Catholicism... ;)

And apparently some other patriarchal religions... remember how Warren Jeffs said that people could only have sex with their wives while they were ovulating?

(Of course, when you have a friggin' harem, it's not that big of a deal to the men...)

[customerserviceguy]

39. When you take the absurdity of the view of sexuality in the Catholic church

and try to codify it into law, you have Sick Rantorum's political positions.

[demtenjeep]

4. and what about those of us who had to have our reproductive parts removed

what would he do to those?

[JoePhilly]

10. He could make a hat, or a pterodactyl ....

Ricky is very creative.

[boston bean]

13. Those women would be used only for the purpose

of men to masturbate. All women who have lost their women parts would be forced into some sort of pornography.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

12. Actually, the Bible says men shouldn't be chokin' the chicken, either.

God once killed a guy for "wasting his seed."

[boston bean]

15. Oh that's so passe....

That isn't what the bible says anymore!

[GreenStormCloud]

49. That was because he withdrew.

She had been the wife of his brother. His brother died. Their law required him to take his brother's widow as an additional wife and make her pregnant. He refused. He enjoyed using her body but withdrew to prevent pregnancy. Since her children would be her support in her old age he was robbing her of her retirement income. She couldn't get pregnant by anybody else because of the restrictive marriage laws they had. His sin wasn't spilling his seed but was robbery of her old age security.

[evilkumquat]

14. Nope. Or sort of.

Look up the story of Onan.

Some people read it for Biblical prohibition against masturbation; others see it as being against frat boy contraception (i.e., "pulling out&quot .

[demtenjeep]

44. found his quote

One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country. It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be. [Sex] is supposed to be within marriage. It’s supposed to be for purposes that are yes, conjugal…but also procreative. That’s the perfect way that a sexual union should happen…This is special and it needs to be seen as special.”
~Rick Santorum, opposing contraception and frighteningly suggesting that he would make pre-marital sex illegal.

[roguevalley]

52. things that are counter to how things are supposed to be? WTF? You mean ... putting the 'thingie' in

the hole? Someone needs to see what he was taught. He has some serious sexual hangups. who is he to decide what is 'supposed to be' in sexual contexts? He can't even talk about it in terms that speak to something this side of the worst case of puritanical prudism I've ever seen.

Mr. Santorum ... its penis and vagina. as for your 'authority' to speak about what is 'supposed to be within marriage' ... WTF again. Seriously. The Catholic Church always makes me smile when they go on about marriage. How the F would they know what a good marriage is and what is normal in a sexual relationship. Someone needs to ask him if he bases his opinions and actions on Catholic doctrine (he does) and why he thinks anyone should take him and that seriously given the child rape and sexual abuse of nuns and religious within the church for oh say ... about two thousand years. What a sad boy. I bet he can't even verbally explain how he got seven kids.

[Amaril]

53. Rick Santorum....

....father of the American Taliban.

[roguevalley]

51. it isn't in the bible but he will. any contraception is wrong. any sex except for procreation is

wrong because he says it will lead to things in marriage that are ... uh ... different I guess than the missionary position every Saturday night at ten.

Someone needs to give this dipshit a sex manual. someone taught him that dirty bits are evil. I think he has his wife wear a night gown with a hole in it like in the old days.

[Curmudgeoness]

2. I second guessed the rest of the post wrong.....

I thought you were going to ask if he also would be going after men who "use Viagra". It seems to me that if god has made a man impotent, it isn't right for the man to try to cheat.

And what about couples who use fertility treatments to get pregnant? God had made the decision that this couple is not supposed to have children----so why should they go behind god's back?

But I suppose that he will not go after men who do their own thing because...well....that will be a little difficult to determine.

Bring on the clowns.

[boston bean]

7. We could train dogs to sniff them out?

no??

[Curmudgeoness]

20. LMAO. Why the hell not! nt

[MH1]

21. Yeah, I'm sure Santorum will be going after men's Viagra.

Not.

[boston bean]

25. A Republican Presidential Candidate introduced all us citizens to

a decade or so ago, ferchrissakes. That would be like spitting on Ronnie Reagans grave.

Leave Viagra ALONE!!!



But not for more than four hours!

[ecstatic]

55. lol. I thought s/he was going to ask if he would also go after

men who "pulled out."

[Curmudgeoness]

56. Scary as it sounds, all of these theories

trying to get into his brain could very well be possible. Agh!

All we do know is that he has little experience with that pull out method---or he doesn't do a very good job of it.

[southernyankeebelle]

5. What nerve Obama wants americans to the their best.

[southernyankeebelle]

45. What are you talking about?

[boston bean]

46. Frankly, I was wondering the same

thing about your comment..

[fredamae]

6. I think every woman should start

billing our gynecological examination expenses to the RNC.
They want to Legally Require/Govern/Control what I can/cannot do with my Uterus? They can fkn Pay for its maintenance too.

[WingDinger]

8. He obviously is a felcher, as he certainly does some shit talkin'.

His form of contraception.

[RKP5637]

9. Santorum probably wants to start seed repositories, "Save the Sperm!"

[boston bean]

16. that could create probably 2 million jobs!

[RKP5637]

26. I can see now under a Santorum administration. New job openings, DHS, for

"Sperm Patrol" candidates.

[boston bean]

32. I think they could open up a bunch more jobs in the TSA for this.

and just call the new employees Testicular, Sperm Analysts.

[RKP5637]

38. And beginning level job would be "Sperm Catcher." LOL

[WingDinger]

18. Hell with that. Save the Santorum. For himself, See felcher.

[undeterred]

22. Exactly, those practicing onanism will face a severe penalty for early withdrawal.

[handmade34]

24. if the truth be told...

[boston bean]

27. I think you screename said it all!

We didn't need any further clues!

[handmade34]

35. ...

[PDJane]

28. Santorum is a form of contraception...........all I have to do is picture him.

and I lose any desire for sex.

[City Lights]

30. LOL!

I'm right there with you on that! Santorum is a total turn off! Ick.

[Paladin]

37. Well Said. (n/t)

[Neoma]

29. I hate the people who ignore the other uses of birth control.

[demtenjeep]

33. well you know in little ricky's mind sex is all about procreation so there would be no need

for disease protection because it would all be with the same man and woman and in his world everyone would be "pure"

[Neoma]

42. That doesn't cover endometriosis.

*sigh*

[justiceischeap]

43. But that only happens to women, so it doesn't matter. nt

[boston bean]

34. Yeah, like the less likely chance that another Rick Santorum

would be born in this world.

[MountainLaurel]

54. I may have to move back to DC if he's elected

Just so I can hemorrhage on his doorstep for 2 weeks out of every month without my contraception.

[City Lights]

36. Are men who use condoms exempt from his scorn?

He is disgusting on so many levels.

[boston bean]

40. No, the expressed fluid is still not being

used for the purpose it was created.

Although, you will be able to get it into the recyle bin more easily.

[RainDog]

41. not to mention birds!

Dorothy Parker named her parakeet "Onan" because he spilled his seed.

[MrSlayer]

47. It's the lustful thoughts that are the sin, not the masturbation in itself.

So said my 11th grade priest. So theoretically you can jerk off all you want as long as you are thinking about something other than sex. Religion is very weird.

[Warren DeMontague]

48. I'm glad he's openly advocating the secret core of the anti-choice agenda

they've always wanted to outlaw contraception, along with abortion. That's why Griswold is the SCOTUS decision they're really gunning for.

It's driven by this insane need to run peoples' lives for them, this misplaced high-horse superiority that says "you can't make THAT choice because blahblahblahblah and I know better than you"

Sadly, a trait that is all too common.

[blue neen]

50. Why do Republicans who say they are for "less government" insist on legislating our bodies?

That's MORE government!

Typical Rick Santorum hypocrisy. They ought to model the Academy Award statue after this poseur.