General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsABC really embarrassed themselves with the Biden/Harris interview, and both Joe and Kamala
were excellent in their responses.
The interviewers were trying to define them according to republican talking points, and Joe and Kamala were having nothing doing with that characterization
Joe and Kamala were talking about moving forward, and where they wanted to focus, while at times it seemed that ABC was more concerned about the primary debates, and taking things out of context.
I certainly hope the media holds trumps feet to the fire, and doesnt turn a blind eye to trump like they did in 2016 and just went after Hillary
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)was spouting off some bullshit question, and I just didn't have the stomach or the patience to stick with it.
They weren't journalists, they were TV personalities.
still_one
(92,204 posts)but our candidates handled it quite well
dem4decades
(11,296 posts)Or a coward.
nancy1942
(635 posts)Normally I like David Muir but the interview was a disapointment. Biden and Harris looked great but other than that it was pretty mediocre. The hosts did their best to focus on controversial nit-picking and ignore everything else. It was a waste of time.
OAITW r.2.0
(24,504 posts)Didn't see the interview, but I've never thought he was a political reporter. But he's good on the Nightly News....he connects with his audience.
agingdem
(7,850 posts)I though Joe and Kamala were brilliant...and this kind of "interview" is nothing they didn't expect...they're going to get a lot more of this crap going forward...remember they are both lawyers...#1 rule when cross examining a witness is never ask a question you don't already know what the answer is...our guys knew the "questions" before they were asked...the answers were easy...
gab13by13
(21,349 posts)the MSM wants Trump to win and not a horse race.
durablend
(7,460 posts)Then when Trump starts arresting and disappearing them they'll say "WHO COULD'VE PREDICTED?!?!? NEVER THOUGHT THIS WOULD HAPPEN!!!!"
agingdem
(7,850 posts)Trump is a network money-maker...and the people that cover him purposely put themselves in his line of fire..Trump spews some playground taunt, the reporter posts it to his/her Instagram, twitter, Facebook pages as a meme...1000+ "views" and "likes" later the target becomes an instant media star and the network cashes in...and in any on air interview Joe and Kamala have to navigate the interviewee's personal bias.. if the interview turns too right or too left then accessibility goes away...our guys know how to deal with this crap...this isn't their first rodeo, pandemic or no pandemic...the difference is we've stopped playing nice and networks don't know how to cover Democrats with spines...
onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)David Muir and robin roberts. Disgusting. Both of them.
liberalla
(9,249 posts)Instead it was an anemic rehash of old news, leftover faux debate controversy...
Very disappointing.
onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)I only wish Joe would have called them both out to their faces.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)visceral sense. I think there's something really not deep enough to conduct such an interview. There didn't seem to be any humanity about the whole discussion. And humanity is exactly what is so grossly missing from the whole RNC project.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)The last of them have died or retired.
onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)of ABC embarrassing himself with Pres Obama.. ******* Fascist ENABLERS!
orleans
(34,053 posts)they were serious, warm, even cute and amusing at times.
david meh was a jerk
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)Loud, lacks focus, and resembles Faux in many ways. Not surprised that they are stirring the pot instead of thoughtful interview questions.
still_one
(92,204 posts)over 400000/year pay their fair share of taxes, and corporations paying zero taxes would not be tolerated, and would need to pay their fair share, etc. The interviewers, especially the male interviewer was more interested in exploited the debate scuffle between Biden and Harris, along with taking statements out of context when Biden talked to an African American radio host
That the interviewers showed very little interest to delve into the policies and agenda of a Biden/Harris administration, and that was very sad for a first interview
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Mopar151
(9,983 posts)And try, desperately to "take down" public figures -Tony Stewart's unfortunate collision with. an angry, out of control driver at a race in NY, had all the fangs out @ABC at 5am
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)that would cause a sensation and generate clicks.
still_one
(92,204 posts)beautifully though, and have me more convinced that they are an excellent team
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)they can to do it.
still_one
(92,204 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 24, 2020, 09:18 AM - Edit history (1)
the republicans feet to the fire in the same way they do the Democrats, then there will be no doubt regarding your speculation
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Bide/Harris by the media
still_one
(92,204 posts)Karma13612
(4,552 posts)Last week as I was driving, I had to listen to them spin on and on about Bidens plagiarism in the ?70s or 80s? during a speech he gave. He was taking lines from a poem from a British poet from like the 19 century.
THATS what they were focusing on the week of the DNC Convention to nominate him.
To save the country from a monster.
Gawd I hate that all we get on radio up here is country Repuke top 40 or National PUBLIC radio out to get the Dems. They always pull this crap.
still_one
(92,204 posts)a detour on the issues facing the country today
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)betsuni
(25,536 posts)forgot to attribute it. That was the big plagiarize scandal.
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)He used parts of the quote again in his acceptance speech.
Much ado about nothing.
llmart
(15,540 posts)They are not the NPR I used to listen to in my younger days.
mucifer
(23,547 posts)a liberal bias.
This American Life and Worldview came out of NPR WBEZ here.
But, yeah lots of the national stories on NPR really piss me off.
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)When they favored Clinton over Obama in 2008.
Overt favoritism.
And then in 2016 when their journalist who also worked for FOX, erased Sanders when discussing potential Democratic candidates.
There dont seem to be any neutral entities anymore.
What happened to just reporting FACTS???
BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)People here want softball questions. That doesnt really make candidates better.
still_one
(92,204 posts)the pandemic, etc
It was more concerned with the debate friction that occurred, mischaracterization when Biden said to an African American radio personality if you vote for trump you arent black
A very weak interview at best
Biden and Harris did fine, but the questions in my view wer not focused very much on substance
jimlup
(7,968 posts)bullshit seriously so that they appear to actually believe the reptilian talking points.