Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the USPS has billions in loses. What kinds of profits does the EPA, US Marshals, etc. bring in? (Original Post) tenderfoot Aug 2020 OP
How much does the US military generate? sinkingfeeling Aug 2020 #1
The bloated military mindem Aug 2020 #6
By that logic -- Mueller investigation for the win JT45242 Aug 2020 #2
To be fair, the US Marshalls, EPA don't really charge on a per service basis. Hoyt Aug 2020 #3
How about the Defense Department? ElementaryPenguin Aug 2020 #4
I wouldn't be surprised if the EPA is net positive overall or close to neutral. fescuerescue Aug 2020 #5
It is a constitutionally mandated government service. CanonRay Aug 2020 #7
Why does it cost a direct fee by item to use it ? MichMan Aug 2020 #8
I don't know the history of it, but it always has, everywhere. CanonRay Aug 2020 #9

mindem

(1,580 posts)
6. The bloated military
Mon Aug 24, 2020, 05:06 PM
Aug 2020

burns thru so much cash they can't even keep an accurate account of where it goes.

JT45242

(2,278 posts)
2. By that logic -- Mueller investigation for the win
Mon Aug 24, 2020, 04:22 PM
Aug 2020

Mueller's investigation brought in much more than it spent to take down Trump's fools.

Therefore Trump should have continued funding the investigation.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. To be fair, the US Marshalls, EPA don't really charge on a per service basis.
Mon Aug 24, 2020, 04:36 PM
Aug 2020

Personally, I think the USPS should come as close as possible to breaking even, with the feds picking up difference if they don’t.

I once calculated that less than a 3% increase in their charge structure would cover all costs. It might be a bit more, now that letter mail has decreased so much.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
5. I wouldn't be surprised if the EPA is net positive overall or close to neutral.
Mon Aug 24, 2020, 04:59 PM
Aug 2020

There are alot of EPA fees built into common everyday items. Things like electricity for instance.

Ultimately the post office services are net even too. It's just that the deficit comes out of income taxes instead of shareholder profit margins.

I think that's ok.

CanonRay

(14,103 posts)
7. It is a constitutionally mandated government service.
Mon Aug 24, 2020, 05:43 PM
Aug 2020

It isn't supposed to be profitable. Like the Army, which provides the service of military protection.

MichMan

(11,932 posts)
8. Why does it cost a direct fee by item to use it ?
Mon Aug 24, 2020, 05:53 PM
Aug 2020

People should be able to mail whatever they want for free

CanonRay

(14,103 posts)
9. I don't know the history of it, but it always has, everywhere.
Mon Aug 24, 2020, 06:42 PM
Aug 2020

I believe it was originally based on distance and package size.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the USPS has billions ...