All joking aside, what really was the purpose of Kimberly Guilfoyle's speech?
My honest assessment was that it was an intended to be the Trumpist-Republican Party's answer to Michelle Obama's speech on Opening Night last week. An "inspiring, rally the troops" type of address.
A few very glaring problems about that, however.
1. Michelle's speech was indeed inspirational and motivational. It was genuine and heart-felt, and was delivered in an appropriately intimate setting that was required under the current circumstances, and that type of setting complimented the message well. On the other hand, despite the volume of her voice, Guilfoyle's speech was cold and lacked any sort of authenticity or depth to it. It was delivered to a large empty room as if there was supposed to be an audience there, but the lack of an audience just made it feel all the more bizarre. It had all the appearances of a bad actresses' failed screen test for a role on some awful historical docudrama with B-movie level production values.
2. The intended audience loved Michelle Obama and knew her well, and was able to emotionally connect with her. After all, she was our First Lady for eight years and her lifelong love and devotion to her husband and children is immediately appealing. Guilfoyle, on the other hand, is just some woman who has been dating Donald Trump's son for the past two years or so. Can even the Trumpist-Republicans say they have any emotional attachment to her at all?
Putting all political biases aside, objectively speaking the entire thing was just an embarrassing failure in terms of rhetoric.
= new reply since forum marked as read
.
Every one of these wierdos is being ginned-up for a race war/liberal coup The RNC as a whole seems to be just an all-in get your guns ready kind of call out. 
