Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,035 posts)
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 12:47 PM Aug 2020

Top general says no role for military in presidential vote

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. armed forces will have no role in carrying out the election process or resolving a disputed vote, the top U.S. military officer told Congress in comments released Friday.

The comments from Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, underscore the extraordinary political environment in America, where the president has declared without evidence that the expected surge in mail-in ballots will make the vote “inaccurate and fraudulent,” and has suggested he might not accept the election results if he loses.

Trump’s repeated complaints questioning the election’s validity have triggered unprecedented worries about the potential for chaos surrounding the election results. Some have speculated that the military might be called upon to get involved, either by Trump trying to use it to help his reelection prospects or as, Democratic challenger Joe Biden has suggested, to remove Trump from the White House if he refuses to accept defeat. The military has adamantly sought to tamp down that speculation and is zealously protective of its historically nonpartisan nature.

“I believe deeply in the principle of an apolitical U.S. military,” Milley said in written responses to several questions posed by two Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee. “In the event of a dispute over some aspect of the elections, by law U.S. courts and the U.S. Congress are required to resolve any disputes, not the U.S. military. I foresee no role for the U.S armed forces in this process.”

https://apnews.com/a979ad8beceacd77c692e42448cf7b82

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top general says no role for military in presidential vote (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2020 OP
Which could mean he interprets the line woodsprite Aug 2020 #1
Good. Happy Hoosier Aug 2020 #2
Amen. secondwind Aug 2020 #3
It's a sad chapter in our history that the top military General has to say this, dware Aug 2020 #4
When the order comes down to "protect" Miguelito Loveless Aug 2020 #5
It only goes to show how broken our government is Chainfire Aug 2020 #6

woodsprite

(11,916 posts)
1. Which could mean he interprets the line
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 12:58 PM
Aug 2020

“ , _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;” as having a parenthetical after it that says (except if the threats are political).

Happy Hoosier

(7,314 posts)
2. Good.
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 01:01 PM
Aug 2020

I do not want generals deciding what the legitimate outcome of an election is. That way leads to military rule.

dware

(12,399 posts)
4. It's a sad chapter in our history that the top military General has to say this,
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 01:04 PM
Aug 2020

this is what has been wrought upon us by the Mango Menace and his criminal org.

That said, I am glad to hear him say that publicly.

Chainfire

(17,549 posts)
6. It only goes to show how broken our government is
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 01:54 PM
Aug 2020

For the Joint Chief, to even have to make such a statement.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Top general says no role ...