General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING: Office of DNI will no longer give Congress election security brieifings in person, only in
writing -- which means no chance to ask questions and provide in-person oversight.
Per this thread from Jake Tapper starting here:
Link to tweet
2/ So far no comment yet from ODNI, or the Senate/House committees.
The official notes that other agencies supporting election security including DOJ DOD and DHS intend to continue briefing congress.
3/ The House and Senate select Committees on Intelligence generally prefer in person briefings where they can ask questions, challenge assumptions and provide actual in person oversight.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)highplainsdem
(49,004 posts)Karma13612
(4,552 posts)BUT,
One upside would be that they will have everything in writing and can confront DNI if facts are disputed later.
But, yea, this is not good.
magicarpet
(14,155 posts).... the White House can edit and closely monitor the info that gets out there and block anything that might reflect poorly upon the trDump administration.
Step by step this Fascist trDump flexes his muscles of authoritarian and totalitarianism. He would proclaim a military junta in a heartbeat if the Chief of Staff would only agree to such a dictatorial move and endorse a full fledged military coup.
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)Get a bunch of cells ready for all the traitors!
ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)What next? It will only be reported in Chinese?
Subpoena if necessary - and haul them in for testimony!!!
WTF!! Oversight is now OPTIONAL???
Celerity
(43,408 posts)to fuck off for years with no real pushback or consequences, other than the fairly meaningless (in terms of true, immediate power games) impeachment.
#sofucked
procon
(15,805 posts)Show displeasure in softball interviews?
Pass a resolution of their unhappiness?
Make boring video ads documenting their grievances?
Maybe when they find a backbrace they'll remember who controls the purse and demand that government agencies deliver what they're paid for. Why isn't there already a legal shop geared up to take everyone of these cowardly, enabling Trump sycophants to court if they even think about was pulling another stunt designed to tip the balance in his favor?
lastlib
(23,247 posts)especially with an authoritarian fascist who FLAGRANTLY disregards and/or disobeys their rulings, right?
And will Barra the Hutt enforce a court-order that the Feuhrer doesn't like? Hell, no! So where do we go?
--- ---
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)many sane republicans are too. shithole supporters are in the minority and well as the cohorts that are enabling him. Let's see how the majority respond to this, then the country will know which way it may end.
mucifer
(23,550 posts)underpants
(182,829 posts)progressive nobody
(816 posts)Putin and his puppet can't cheat or steal this election.
I was firm in going to the polls and so is my husband. I humble suggest those who are healthy enough and access to early voting please do so safely. Those who can walk there ballots back to the board of elections to make sure it counts do it. Those voting by mail PLEASE get it in early.
This is the latest movement that we know of-but we must think of how many moves they have already taken.
LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)Trump, his family, and every other scumbag like Pompeo need to have their security clearances revoked. Absolutely no national security briefings for them.
IronLionZion
(45,453 posts)so our next president can finally do it correctly again...if we can win this election.
BKDem
(1,733 posts)It's almost as if they believe they can't lose.
sellitman
(11,607 posts)Just like he promised.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)I was thinking about that throughout 2017 and 2018, that the Mueller probe was necessary but meanwhile the GOP was laughing at the distraction because it allowed them to cheat and suppress toward 2020 with nobody paying attention
Lonestarblue
(10,011 posts)We need ads reminding people to check their registrations, especially if they havent voted in awhile. Add in some information about why mailed ballots are rejected, such as failure to sign or not following directions precisely. We need every vote to count.
Jack-o-Lantern
(967 posts)ancianita
(36,081 posts)The Executive may NOT tell the Legislative HOW, and therefore WHAT, it may or may not oversee.
What goes to SCOTUS is between The House Counsel and Trump Counsel, not The House and John Ratcliff.
iluvtennis
(19,863 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Or more so a leaker in the repuke led Senate Intel Committee?
Could this be a protection move to not show our cards to Russia?
bluestarone
(16,976 posts)COMPLETE FUNDING CUT?
soldierant
(6,890 posts)It takes time to formulate a response which is strong enough but contains no profanity.
aeromanKC
(3,324 posts)DFW
(54,405 posts)I can't wait to see these thugs behind bars for decades for their treason.
If we take back the White House and Senate, NOTHING had better be "off the table."
and that includes the filibuster!!
seta1950
(932 posts)I dont know if I want Election Day to be here or not, they are so evil it scares me to death.
moondust
(19,993 posts)That way, it would seem, they can put whatever BS they want in the written "updates" and not have to undergo any uncomfortable questioning about it.
Reminds me of George Tenet claiming the Intel on Iraq was a "slam dunk." That gave BushCo significant cover to launch their Iraq invasion and to later blame the intelligence community for getting it wrong. I have no doubt that if Congress had questioned the intelligence professionals who had actually followed the intel on Iraq for the previous decade they would have heard a much different story.