Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Andrea Mitchell reports or Andrea Mitchell distorts? What say you. nt (Original Post) mfcorey1 Sep 2012 OP
Personally, I'm not as upset with Mitchell as so many here are. JohnnyRingo Sep 2012 #1

JohnnyRingo

(18,635 posts)
1. Personally, I'm not as upset with Mitchell as so many here are.
Mon Sep 24, 2012, 01:14 PM
Sep 2012

The biggest complaint here is that she takes what guests say at face value and often refuses to set the record straight with damning follow-up questions.

That's true, she asks the interview questions and generally lets the person put their chips on the table without debate. This is what actual reporters do, including the White House pool (Chuck Todd). Then they let the pundits and fact checkers loose on their reported statements.

An interview that includes counter statements by the reporter is not an interview, it's an argument.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Andrea Mitchell reports o...