General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden Aced the Town Hall. Why Didn't Trump?
BloombergThe secret of these events, in which candidates answer questions directly from voters, is that theyre easy. For one thing, voters tend to ask policy questions, not process ones, and theyre usually pretty straightforward what are you going to do about such-and-such? Normal politicians can easily anticipate the topics, and usually have a prepared riff or a five-point plan to address them. Biden did some of that Thursday night. Hes not great at it, not nearly as strong as (for example) Senator Elizabeth Warren is. But hes good enough. And hes usually excellent at taking advantage of the other opportunity the format provides, which is to show the ability to connect with voters and empathize with them.
Trump is barely able to do either of these things. He did manage to demonstrate empathy a couple of times on Tuesday, but unfortunately in one case he misunderstood the questioner and thought that her mother had died from the pandemic when in fact she had died of cancer. Most of the time, though, he didnt bother. Its not just that he didnt get emotional. He didnt seem to be listening to the questions. So when the same woman asked about immigration, Trump immediately said that we are doing something with immigration that I think is going to be very strong but he never got around to saying what this something would be. Then he started talking about a vaccine and other medications for the virus.
Its not that ducking questions is necessarily bad; Biden did so a couple of times on Thursday. But he did so by answering a somewhat different question on the same general topic, and in ways that at least connected back to the original. Trump just doesnt know how to do that.
Yeehah
(4,595 posts)and Trump is a stupid traitorous asshole?
Seems obvious to me.
Joe Biden is awesome. It would be great to have a president who can understand molecular Biology and can actually read.
Claustrum
(4,846 posts)Biden invites them to sit around the table and actually listens to them. He asks intelligent questions and try to understand their points.
Trump, on the other hand, treats experts as a prop. They are only there to stand around while he keeps talking. He doesn't listen to them unless it's a point that reinforces his own view on the matter.
DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)The writer disses Trump and Biden....absurd. Joe was light years ahead.
brooklynite
(94,757 posts)Biden wasn't perfect; few politicians are. Which critique do you feel was unfair?
DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)Check some other posts here too and form your own opinion after reading the article. As some pointed out, it's both-siderism.
No comparison between Trump's pathetic performance and Biden's. This author basically says Trump was bad, and Biden was just ok.
That's a hatchet job, constructing a new reality (i.e., Trump bad, Biden slightly better).
DarthDem
(5,257 posts)Bloomberg News draws you in with what promises to be a truthful headline, then savages Trump while engaged in loads of comepnsatory bothsiderism.
I'd say Bloomberg "aced" the article in the sense of getting the truth half right. In truth, Mr. Trump was just as horrible as they say. (He was actually even worse.) Biden, by contrast, was excellent.
Johnny2X2X
(19,140 posts)It's a board associated with the college I attended. The off topic board is all politics. After Tuesday, the thread on Trump's performance had zero Conservatives chiming in to defend his dreadful performance, they were totally MIA. Last night and today it's a lively debate, all the Dems are there to discuss how much better Biden did whole the Cons are seizing on a few of Joe's rambling moments.
Tells you everything, Cons really want to forget Tuesday, and feel the need to try to tear Joe's solid performance apart. Dems are excited by Biden's performance and know Trump was terrible Tuesday.