Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Celerity

(50,974 posts) Tue Sep 29, 2020, 11:45 PM Sep 2020

Pete-Rough night for the American presidency.Good thing we get to do something about that-right now

Link to tweet

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pete-Rough night for the American presidency.Good thing we get to do something about that-right now (Original Post) Celerity Sep 2020 OP

K&R Blue Owl Sep 2020 #1

Thanks for helping Joe, Pete! BootinUp Sep 2020 #2

And Pete is exactly right. This is up to us now, and this is our chance. CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2020 #3

I would have loved seeing Pete debate Trump Renew Deal Sep 2020 #4

+1000 Celerity Sep 2020 #6

VOTE! jimlup Sep 2020 #5

Blue Owl

(56,738 posts)

1. K&R

Reply to Celerity (Original post)

Tue Sep 29, 2020, 11:46 PM

Sep 2020

BootinUp

(50,104 posts)

2. Thanks for helping Joe, Pete!

Reply to Celerity (Original post)

Tue Sep 29, 2020, 11:47 PM

Sep 2020

CaliforniaPeggy

(154,551 posts)

3. And Pete is exactly right. This is up to us now, and this is our chance.

Reply to Celerity (Original post)

Tue Sep 29, 2020, 11:47 PM

Sep 2020

Renew Deal

(84,284 posts)

4. I would have loved seeing Pete debate Trump

Reply to Celerity (Original post)

Tue Sep 29, 2020, 11:48 PM

Sep 2020

It would have been fun.

Celerity

(50,974 posts)

6. +1000

Reply to Renew Deal (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 29, 2020, 11:55 PM

Sep 2020

jimlup

(8,008 posts)

5. VOTE!

Reply to Celerity (Original post)

Tue Sep 29, 2020, 11:51 PM

Sep 2020

That is the answer. If it doesn't work then talk to me. I have another answer but until then let's VOTE!

Reply to this discussion