WOW !!! Barret: Felony convictions to deny voting? OK? To Deny Firearms ? NOT !!

[uponit7771]

Barret sounds more like a winger political hack than a judge and the fact she sat on any court is scary.

She at minimum sounds like she's racially unaware but looking at these hacks its always more than that.

Now she says to Durbin; "...you're taking my statement on Kanter out of context..."

BULLL SHIT

Voting and Gun Ownership are rights ... PERIOD but she in a dissent treat them different.


Done, wanted to be objective but she's said to much already that can't be denied now.

CONCLUSION: ***HACK***

[BKDem]

1. I can't watch this, but it sounds like a horror show.

How far we have fallen in four years.

[Statistical]

2. At least people staying home or voting third party because Clinton didn't give them the feels

has no significant long term consequences right?

This insane lady is going to be on the bench for 30 possibly 40 friggin years.

[BKDem]

4. I will be among the grateful dead.

[uponit7771]

7. +1

[dalton99a]

3. Barrett doesn't disappoint.

[Proud Liberal Dem]

5. This makes no sense to me

[BComplex]

6. But she's a REPUBLICAN hack, and we currently have minority rule, so they're going to love

having her on the court.

There are not 4 republican senators that will vote her down. Republicans are sheep. They will stay with the herd, because they're lead to believe that any deviance from that would mean a big bad wolf might eat them.

Republicans are weak, scared, usually fairly stupid, and easily manipulated by their own leaders.

[Baked Potato]

8. She is so transparent. EOM

[FakeNoose]

9. She needs to resign from the Federal Bench

Forget SCOTUS - she shouldn't even be a judge at all.

Maybe she's a decent lawyer, I don't know. She's probably a pretty good law professor. But an appointment to the Judiciary Bench is something altogether different - and it requires totally different skills. Barrett is no judge, she's a RW political hack.

[uponit7771]

10. +1