Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Soph0571

(9,685 posts)
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 06:52 AM Oct 2020

Amy Coney Barrett ruled using the n-word does not make a work environment hostile

BECAUSE OF COURSE SHE DID...

The Associated Press published a report on Ms Barrett's most notable judicial opinions, which included a 2019 workplace discrimination case in which she penned the opinion that the use of the n-word in the workplace had not "created a hostile or abusive working environment."

Ms Barrett wrote on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel that issued the ruling.

In the ruling, Ms Barrett said that while she found the use of the word abhorrent, the plaintiff in the case had not made a strong enough case that harassment was occurring.

[link:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-supreme-court-n-word-b1016358.html|

The most disturbing thing here is that there is zero acknowledgement that weaponizing that particular pejorative against people of colour is in and off itself one of the most hostile acts that a white person can commit. White religious privilege summed up in this judgement. And that she does not recognise the impact of racist language and that the use of it is always an attack, and the impact of it will always be hostile is horrifying. I think she knows. I think she does not care. Just like the rest of them.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amy Coney Barrett ruled using the n-word does not make a work environment hostile (Original Post) Soph0571 Oct 2020 OP
I guess she'd let her own two adopted children Ilsa Oct 2020 #1
I wonder if she, herself were subjected to gender derogatory language Sherman A1 Oct 2020 #2
She would take it because she is down with the patriarchy Soph0571 Oct 2020 #3
She's perfectly okay with people treating her like shit. Dave Starsky Oct 2020 #5
picture Scalia onethatcares Oct 2020 #4
And screaming . . . Iliyah Oct 2020 #6
From Today's Hearing Cosmo Blues Oct 2020 #7
Gilead in ..3...2...1.... n/t Soph0571 Oct 2020 #8
Post removed Post removed Oct 2020 #9

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
1. I guess she'd let her own two adopted children
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 06:59 AM
Oct 2020

from Haiti deal with the assault on their own, tell them they shouldn't feel bad, etc. How unfeeling.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
2. I wonder if she, herself were subjected to gender derogatory language
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 07:22 AM
Oct 2020

In her work place by supervisory personal would she feel the same?

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
5. She's perfectly okay with people treating her like shit.
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 07:48 AM
Oct 2020

As long as she knows someone else is getting it worse than she does.

onethatcares

(16,172 posts)
4. picture Scalia
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 07:48 AM
Oct 2020

sitting at his desk and yelling, "Hey bitch, get in here" Would that be considered hostile?

I used the term as an example.

Cosmo Blues

(2,487 posts)
7. From Today's Hearing
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 06:38 PM
Oct 2020

From what I heard black people have their rights, birth control, at least, I'm assuming, the ones she believes are okay are safe, but gay people, voting rights, climate change, extralegal Presidential Power is still on the table

Response to Soph0571 (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Amy Coney Barrett ruled u...