General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmy Coney Barrett ruled using the n-word does not make a work environment hostile
BECAUSE OF COURSE SHE DID...
Ms Barrett wrote on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel that issued the ruling.
In the ruling, Ms Barrett said that while she found the use of the word abhorrent, the plaintiff in the case had not made a strong enough case that harassment was occurring.
[link:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-supreme-court-n-word-b1016358.html|
The most disturbing thing here is that there is zero acknowledgement that weaponizing that particular pejorative against people of colour is in and off itself one of the most hostile acts that a white person can commit. White religious privilege summed up in this judgement. And that she does not recognise the impact of racist language and that the use of it is always an attack, and the impact of it will always be hostile is horrifying. I think she knows. I think she does not care. Just like the rest of them.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)from Haiti deal with the assault on their own, tell them they shouldn't feel bad, etc. How unfeeling.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)In her work place by supervisory personal would she feel the same?
Soph0571
(9,685 posts)She enables them
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)As long as she knows someone else is getting it worse than she does.
onethatcares
(16,172 posts)sitting at his desk and yelling, "Hey bitch, get in here" Would that be considered hostile?
I used the term as an example.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)you dumb stupid slut . .
This women is out of touch with the real world.
Cosmo Blues
(2,487 posts)From what I heard black people have their rights, birth control, at least, I'm assuming, the ones she believes are okay are safe, but gay people, voting rights, climate change, extralegal Presidential Power is still on the table
Soph0571
(9,685 posts)Response to Soph0571 (Original post)
Post removed