Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton Schools Handmaiden Barrett on Originalism (Original Post) bigtree Oct 2020 OP
Sarah Cooper had a great response Trumpocalypse Oct 2020 #1
Wouldn't an originalist interpretation set the number of electoral votes at 1 for every 30000 StTimofEdenRoc Oct 2020 #21
K&R betsuni Oct 2020 #2
She looks like a young Delores Umbridge Lars39 Oct 2020 #3
Dolores Umbridge volstork Oct 2020 #11
Good point. Lars39 Oct 2020 #18
She does. Harker Oct 2020 #12
And now I can't unsee it lol Lars39 Oct 2020 #16
We're stuck with it. n/t Harker Oct 2020 #20
FWIW, there were a small number of women judges before women got the right to vote. unblock Oct 2020 #4
sort of bigtree Oct 2020 #6
Actually she doesn't since there is an amendment Coleman Oct 2020 #5
Clever attorneys used the 14th to argue for Constitutional rights for corporations. CrispyQ Oct 2020 #9
Corporations are not persons !!!!!!!!!!!! TryLogic Oct 2020 #17
That would lead to massive abuses jmowreader Oct 2020 #26
All legal persons must follow the law CrispyQ Oct 2020 #31
This is specifically why I think we need to support Roe with the 13th and NOT the 14th Amendment. Moostache Oct 2020 #24
Totally agree about the 13th! CrispyQ Oct 2020 #32
They had hand grenades.... SergeStorms Oct 2020 #28
Barrett would like to have slaves, perhaps. That was originalism. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2020 #7
This is something I was hoping would be brought up to Barrett's area51 Oct 2020 #8
👆 This. crickets Oct 2020 #10
Excellent. K&R PunkinPi Oct 2020 #13
In which case Barrett would need to recuse herself from the nomination. Reader Rabbit Oct 2020 #14
I personally don't want to have to go back to horse 'n' buggy transportation, day to day. calimary Oct 2020 #15
Subscribing to originalism? She is a damn fool. (Another one) TryLogic Oct 2020 #19
It's becoming clear to me that Amy just isn't very bright. BKDem Oct 2020 #27
Kick....n/t Upthevibe Oct 2020 #22
If she was an originalist she would be home scrubbing floors and doing laundry. olegramps Oct 2020 #23
And if she got sick wcollar Oct 2020 #25
Originalism is a fraud. It's always been a fraud. RGTIndy Oct 2020 #29
"ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL"... czarjak Oct 2020 #30
 

StTimofEdenRoc

(445 posts)
21. Wouldn't an originalist interpretation set the number of electoral votes at 1 for every 30000
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 02:32 PM
Oct 2020

resident plus 2 for each state?

unblock

(52,253 posts)
4. FWIW, there were a small number of women judges before women got the right to vote.
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 12:20 PM
Oct 2020

At least in some states. Not sure if any were at the federal level. There was one for d.c. family court so technically that was federally appointed

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
6. sort of
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 12:29 PM
Oct 2020

In 1884, the District of Columbia trial court appointed Marilla Ricker to the position of United States Commissioner. In 1886, the first woman to graduate from Pennsylvania Law School was appointed master in chancery for the city of Philadelphia. By 1907, Evanston, Illinois elected a woman, Catherine Waugh McCulloch to serve as a justice of the peace.

In 1914, Georgia Bullock was appointed the "woman judge" of Los Angeles, in charge of a court segregated by sex where "she would serve as a model of Victorian ideals of womanhood for female misdemeanants."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_United_States_judiciary

Coleman

(853 posts)
5. Actually she doesn't since there is an amendment
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 12:26 PM
Oct 2020

A better example would be the 14th Amendments equal protection clause. The original intent was that applied only to male african americans. So according to her it cannot be used to support LGBTQ and women's rights. Or even white male rights.

Also look at the 2nd Amendment. Scalia, an originalist, believed this meant that a person can own any weapon that is carried by the basic infantryman. At one of his speaking engagements, he was asked if this included hand grenades and he answered "Yes."

CrispyQ

(36,478 posts)
9. Clever attorneys used the 14th to argue for Constitutional rights for corporations.
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 01:01 PM
Oct 2020

So we should revoke corporate personhood. A lot of ills in this country could be righted if we did that.


jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
26. That would lead to massive abuses
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 03:03 PM
Oct 2020

In the USA, only “persons” can be required to obey the law.

Revoke corporate personhood and they’ll be like “now we can do anything we want!”

CrispyQ

(36,478 posts)
31. All legal persons must follow the law
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 04:14 PM
Oct 2020

and that includes natural persons, (humans), & all artificial persons (corporations, small businesses, labor unions, governments, civics groups, churches, and any other type of group formed by some type of legal process). Corporations, however, have claimed & demanded the same personhood rights as natural persons, unlike the other artificial persons, who just have the privileges that we (natural persons) grant them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_person

So we have these powerful, wealthy entities that never die, competing with us for things like our natural resources, working against us on issues like clean water & safe medications. The framers never meant for corporations to have the same rights as living breathing people.

https://vault.sierraclub.org/sierra/200509/corporation.asp

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
24. This is specifically why I think we need to support Roe with the 13th and NOT the 14th Amendment.
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 02:50 PM
Oct 2020

The 14th for equal protection is what prevents states from outlawing abortion NOW...but if abortion rights are upheld on a 13th Amendment (which states: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction) challenge, that could bar states from passing laws to limit access to abortion as an infringement on the involuntary servitude language of the 13th...

Shit, at this point, I believe ANYTHING that supports and maintains a WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE should be seriously on the table...ACB is going to be 100% across the board arch-conservative, period. We're wasting time asking her questions as if that fact were seriously in doubt.

SergeStorms

(19,201 posts)
28. They had hand grenades....
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 03:11 PM
Oct 2020

when the Constitution was written and ratified? Seems like Scalia contradicted himself there on originalism.

area51

(11,910 posts)
8. This is something I was hoping would be brought up to Barrett's
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 12:45 PM
Oct 2020

hypocritical face, that as a female, she should not have the ability to be a judge, and to take an SC position that could have gone to a man.

PunkinPi

(4,875 posts)
13. Excellent. K&R
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 01:43 PM
Oct 2020

Have to say I liked Mayor Lori Lightfoot's response as well...



The Constitution didn't even recognize me as a human being when it was first ratified. So, no, I am not a Constitutional originalist.

Reader Rabbit

(2,624 posts)
14. In which case Barrett would need to recuse herself from the nomination.
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 01:52 PM
Oct 2020

Can someone add that to their line of questioning?

calimary

(81,312 posts)
15. I personally don't want to have to go back to horse 'n' buggy transportation, day to day.
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 02:14 PM
Oct 2020

But that certainly would take care of the airlines that are yowling for more money, 'eh?

Well, at the time the Constitution was written, there were no airplanes. So by that logic, this is what should rule all things now, 'eh?

olegramps

(8,200 posts)
23. If she was an originalist she would be home scrubbing floors and doing laundry.
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 02:45 PM
Oct 2020

Women were owned and men ruled. They either shut their mouth and got dinner or a fist. They were treated like shit in most cases. I wonder if she thinks that she can get in her Time Machine and go back totally understand the intent of the Founders.

wcollar

(176 posts)
25. And if she got sick
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 02:59 PM
Oct 2020

she'd better like barber surgeons, no antibiotics, no concept of bacteria and viri.
Better ask her how she feels about leaches and bloodletting.

 

RGTIndy

(203 posts)
29. Originalism is a fraud. It's always been a fraud.
Wed Oct 14, 2020, 03:19 PM
Oct 2020

It's just a handy tool for reactionaries to be reactionary. But as anyone who reads cases knows, it is regularly abandoned (without acknowledgement or even comment) when it can't be used to reach an outcome that benefits the rich and powerful.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton Schools H...