First we need a case...so we gin up one with a person suffering kidney failure but with a genetic match to a woman in their family.
We then have them denied an operation that forces the woman to utilize her healthy kidneys to support the failing kidneys of another person.
That becomes the new precedent for abortion - stop debating person-hood or 'rights to life'. A fetus, upon the request of the woman bearing it should be surgically removed and placed in the custody of a pro-life advocacy group to maintain and care for...let them defend the indentured servitude and involuntary slavery of internal organ-sharing of and by females to fetuses.
I can show them the 13th amendment:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
If a fetus can survive upon removal from a woman's body, then it is no longer imposing involuntary servitude on a woman (this is usually not possible without extreme medical intervention until the 3rd trimester); HOWEVER, should an emergency arise after the onset of such a delineating line, and the development of the fetus cease to progress (a stillborn or blighted pregnancy or fetal death in utero causing sepsis or potential loss of fertility to the woman) or the survival of the mother become medically endangered, abortion of the fetus again becomes subject to the involuntary servitude clause of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.
Show me the difference between forcibly making a woman an involuntary organ donor or human dialysis machine and making a different woman an involuntary brood mare for the state or more appropriately for the puritanical prudes of the religious right who SAY they are "Pro-life" until it becomes time to actually foster and support that life when they tie to someone else's finances.
Women get to choose how their bodies are used, period. And they - and they alone - get to seek outside consul for such decisions. IF they wish to consult a biological father, priest, shaman, witch or any other type of advisor or mentor, then again THE WOMAN decides to seek that consul, not the STATE and not a religious faction of one party of the state.
= new reply since forum marked as read
