Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe alarming question behind Barr's 'unmasking' probe
Link to tweet
Tweet text: Asha Rangappa
@AshaRangappa_
My latest for @cnn on the real question raised by Barr's failed "unmasking" probe: What, exactly, was Flynn up to that raised alarm bells for so many people?
Opinion: The alarming question behind Barr's 'unmasking' probe
Barr's unmasking investigation answers the question of whether Obama administration officials made legitimate and justified unmasking requests. They did, writes Asha Rangappa. But it raises a new...
cnn.com
@AshaRangappa_
My latest for @cnn on the real question raised by Barr's failed "unmasking" probe: What, exactly, was Flynn up to that raised alarm bells for so many people?
Opinion: The alarming question behind Barr's 'unmasking' probe
Barr's unmasking investigation answers the question of whether Obama administration officials made legitimate and justified unmasking requests. They did, writes Asha Rangappa. But it raises a new...
cnn.com
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/14/opinions/real-question-behind-barrs-unmasking-probe-rangappa/index.html
(CNN)Attorney General William Barr's personally ordered an investigation into the Obama administration's handling of intelligence reports -- dubbed "OBAMAGATE!" by President Trump -- apparently ended with a whimper Tuesday. US Attorney John Bash concluded that no substantive wrongdoing took place, people familiar with the matter told The Washington Post.
The implications of this finding are significant, and not good for President Donald Trump.
The crux of this investigation involves "masking" and "unmasking," terms used by the intelligence community to refer to shielding (or revealing) the names of people mentioned in an intelligence report who were not the targets of the investigation.
For example, if the National Security Agency intercepts a conversation between a foreign intelligence target and someone in the United States, a report on that conversation disseminated outside the agency would refer to the American as "U.S. PERSON 1," not by name. This process protects the Fourth Amendment rights of someone who is "incidentally" (though still legally) caught up in our intelligence gathering efforts on foreign targets.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 587 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The alarming question behind Barr's 'unmasking' probe (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Oct 2020
OP
Yup. Barr found something. And now we have to hope the paper shredders don't burn
Baitball Blogger
Oct 2020
#2
genxlib
(5,536 posts)1. That's an important story
Thank you for posting it.
I hope this helps keep Flynn under the gun despite Barr trying to let him go.
Baitball Blogger
(46,758 posts)2. Yup. Barr found something. And now we have to hope the paper shredders don't burn
in the late night hour so we can find out exactly what happened.