Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal judge strikes down Trump plan to slash food stamps for 700,000 unemployed Americans
trump is one heartless FUCK
A federal judge on Sunday formally struck down a Trump administration attempt to end food stamp benefits for nearly 700,000 unemployed people, blocking as arbitrary and capricious the first of three such planned measures to restrict the federal food safety net.
In a scathing 67-page opinion, Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell of D.C. condemned the Agriculture Department for failing to justify or even address the impact of the sweeping change on states, saying its shortcomings had been placed in stark relief amid the coronavirus pandemic, during which unemployment has quadrupled and rosters of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program have grown by more than 17 percent, with more than 6 million new enrollees.
The rule at issue in this litigation radically and abruptly alters decades of regulatory practice, leaving States scrambling and exponentially increasing food insecurity for tens of thousands of Americans, Howell wrote, adding that the Agriculture Department has been icily silent about how many [adults] would have been denied SNAP benefits had the changes sought . . . been in effect while the pandemic rapidly spread across the country. The judge concluded that the departments utter failure to address the issue renders the agency action arbitrary and capricious.
Howells ruling granted summary judgment to a coalition of 19 states, Washington, D.C., New York City and private groups that sued to stop the new rule, finalized in December, to eliminate states discretion to waive work requirements in distressed economic areas.
In a scathing 67-page opinion, Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell of D.C. condemned the Agriculture Department for failing to justify or even address the impact of the sweeping change on states, saying its shortcomings had been placed in stark relief amid the coronavirus pandemic, during which unemployment has quadrupled and rosters of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program have grown by more than 17 percent, with more than 6 million new enrollees.
The rule at issue in this litigation radically and abruptly alters decades of regulatory practice, leaving States scrambling and exponentially increasing food insecurity for tens of thousands of Americans, Howell wrote, adding that the Agriculture Department has been icily silent about how many [adults] would have been denied SNAP benefits had the changes sought . . . been in effect while the pandemic rapidly spread across the country. The judge concluded that the departments utter failure to address the issue renders the agency action arbitrary and capricious.
Howells ruling granted summary judgment to a coalition of 19 states, Washington, D.C., New York City and private groups that sued to stop the new rule, finalized in December, to eliminate states discretion to waive work requirements in distressed economic areas.
***PayWall***https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/trump-food-stamp-cuts/2020/10/18/7c124612-117a-11eb-ad6f-36c93e6e94fb_story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1696 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (39)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge strikes down Trump plan to slash food stamps for 700,000 unemployed Americans (Original Post)
spanone
Oct 2020
OP
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)1. Good!
spanone
(135,888 posts)2. Can you believe this monster?
BigmanPigman
(51,636 posts)3. Glad to see some fed judges rule against him.
Team tRump hasn't tainted all pf them.
Blue Owl
(50,519 posts)4. I'm so goddamned sick of that fucker
A million times!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
madashelltoo
(1,701 posts)5. Why is this shit even necessary?
Really? This nightmare has got to end.
spanone
(135,888 posts)6. What other nightmares are going on under the radar of his bullshit?
MissMillie
(38,583 posts)7. I think maybe...
.... those food boxes (the USDA has been giving out to people in need) should contain a letter from Mr. Trump telling everyone that he's trying to cut their food stamps.
elleng
(131,159 posts)8. Thank goodness for the independent judiciary.
moondust
(20,007 posts)9. Attempted mass murder.
File with other Nuremberg-Hague evidence.
marble falls
(57,288 posts)10. Merry fucking Christmas!
Boogiemack
(1,406 posts)11. Not to worry RWingers. Trump will appeal. nt