Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVox: Trump's plan to win by invalidating votes, explained
This is why we can't just stop at beating Trump. We have to try to beat Republicans up and down the ballot given their increasingly brazen efforts to sabotage the election.
https://www.vox.com/2020/11/1/21544279/vote-count-trump-pennsylvania-mail
Behind in the polls, Republicans are becoming increasingly blunt about their plan to win the election: dont let everyones votes be counted. As Astead Herndon and Annie Karnie reported for the the New York Times Saturday evening: Trump advisers said their best hope was if the president wins Ohio and Florida is too close to call early in the night, depriving Mr. Biden a swift victory and giving Mr. Trump the room to undermine the validity of uncounted mail-in ballots in the days after.
This is a very plausible scenario. As Voxs Andrew Prokop has explained, due to differences in local election law, the general expectation is that Florida, North Carolina, and Arizona are in a good place to count most of their votes on election night or soon afterward but Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan the trio of states that clinched Trumps victory in 2016 are a different story.
Current polls show Biden leading in all six states. But his leads are narrower in the fast-counting states than in the slow-counting states, so if Trump does moderately better than polls currently suggest, he could win the fast-counting states on election night and wage battle in the courts to try to prevent the slow-counting from fully tallying their votes.
Its a long-shot effort, but the only reason its on the table at all is that the GOP-controlled legislatures in those three states have deliberately acted to keep the vote count slow. So theres indication Trump may have party support if he tries to undermine the counting. Meanwhile, other actions over the weekend from North Carolina to Texas reveal a Republican Party that is broadly committed to using roadblocks to voting as a strategy for victory.
This is a very plausible scenario. As Voxs Andrew Prokop has explained, due to differences in local election law, the general expectation is that Florida, North Carolina, and Arizona are in a good place to count most of their votes on election night or soon afterward but Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan the trio of states that clinched Trumps victory in 2016 are a different story.
Current polls show Biden leading in all six states. But his leads are narrower in the fast-counting states than in the slow-counting states, so if Trump does moderately better than polls currently suggest, he could win the fast-counting states on election night and wage battle in the courts to try to prevent the slow-counting from fully tallying their votes.
Its a long-shot effort, but the only reason its on the table at all is that the GOP-controlled legislatures in those three states have deliberately acted to keep the vote count slow. So theres indication Trump may have party support if he tries to undermine the counting. Meanwhile, other actions over the weekend from North Carolina to Texas reveal a Republican Party that is broadly committed to using roadblocks to voting as a strategy for victory.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 743 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vox: Trump's plan to win by invalidating votes, explained (Original Post)
TomCADem
Nov 2020
OP
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)1. Are his wing-nut supporters...
Are his wing-nut supporters signaling that by blocking roads, tear gassing voters and performing ambushes?
It's a new form of goose stepping in lock step with Hair Furor.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)2. Un-American!
Thats what they used to call Democrats at the drop of a hat during the Bush years. That is what they are and what they are doing. Their actions are antithetical to Democracy, the Constitution, and the American way!
Lets call them what they are, un-American!