Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bozita

(26,955 posts)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:25 AM Oct 2012

Big Ed had a radio caller today who feared a tax increase on his $265K income

Said he made $265,000 last year, had 4 kids in college, and couldn't afford a 3.5% tax hike.

Caller thought the tax hike would be on the entire $265k.

Ed tried to explain to him that his tax increase would be based on his earnings ABOVE $250,000.

Caller's tax increase would be $15,000 times 0.035 equals $525.

Ten bucks a week!

Just how fucking hard is this to understand?

Sounds to me like this is a teachable moment for the Dems.


39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Big Ed had a radio caller today who feared a tax increase on his $265K income (Original Post) Bozita Oct 2012 OP
Did the guy get it? gateley Oct 2012 #1
Arrived at my destination before the discussion was concluded. Bozita Oct 2012 #3
Usually when "those" people call, they refuse to listen to the facts. gateley Oct 2012 #5
The guy got it, but LuvLoogie Oct 2012 #6
Thank you. I agree. Bozita Oct 2012 #12
It's being "forgotten" on purpose. Should be repeated MUCH more than it is. nt patrice Oct 2012 #2
I hope Ed also pointed out tax rates are based on Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) -- AFTER deductions. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2012 #4
Even better! LuvLoogie Oct 2012 #7
I wish now that I had driven in the slow lane. Bozita Oct 2012 #8
AGI isn't after deductions dems_rightnow Oct 2012 #30
You are correct. I misspoke. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2012 #34
I thought job creators was supposed to be smart. ( n/t ) Make7 Oct 2012 #9
i'd expect them to know from marginal rates. seems odd that he wouldn't. HiPointDem Oct 2012 #18
It's almost like he has no idea how much taxes... Make7 Oct 2012 #19
yeah & in my (limited) experience, that's one thing wealthy people always know. HiPointDem Oct 2012 #22
He will cling to that $525 bucks like a tick on a dog, and lose his ass on his house when the bank lonestarnot Oct 2012 #10
How does someone that ignorant make $265K? HooptieWagon Oct 2012 #11
The President rarely explains... LuvLoogie Oct 2012 #13
welcome to DU! renate Oct 2012 #16
I heard that call. KSstellarcat Oct 2012 #14
Welcome to DU, KSstellarcat! Bozita Oct 2012 #38
He doesn't. Iwillnevergiveup Oct 2012 #20
You would be surprised how absolutely stupid some rich people are. fasttense Oct 2012 #24
and the people on that Romney video including Romney himself and their foreign policy discussion JI7 Oct 2012 #29
Samuel Zell is example number 1. nt bluestate10 Oct 2012 #39
so he figures people who make much less than him can afford to pay more? uncle ray Oct 2012 #15
Actually... DirtyDawg Oct 2012 #17
Correction: Not earnings. Taxable. Big difference. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2012 #35
I heard it. It was incredibly hard to listen to ToxMarz Oct 2012 #21
I should have such woes. JohnnyRingo Oct 2012 #23
The cap on SS taxes should be eliminated SickOfTheOnePct Oct 2012 #25
I think that's wrong. It's less. More like $70 on the next 100K$. Festivito Oct 2012 #26
No SickOfTheOnePct Oct 2012 #28
if he is making that much money wouldn't he already know that ? caller could be a "joe the plumber" JI7 Oct 2012 #27
yes the population is dumbed down so much cling2reality Oct 2012 #32
well some people who make this kind of money..... madrchsod Oct 2012 #31
If you're pulling down $265,000 and you have less at the end of the week alcibiades_mystery Oct 2012 #37
You think this could be explained to any Repuke? Doctor_J Oct 2012 #33
Dumbass needs to talk to his accountant sadbear Oct 2012 #36

Bozita

(26,955 posts)
3. Arrived at my destination before the discussion was concluded.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:29 AM
Oct 2012

I'm hoping someone who heard the broadcast would let us know.

LuvLoogie

(7,011 posts)
6. The guy got it, but
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:35 AM
Oct 2012

Ed really didn't explain it well. Ed gets too emotional sometimes. The guy was getting it at the end, and was explaining it better than Ed was. Ed was clearly irritated and could not succinctly articulate that the first $250G would be taxed at the current rate, and the increase would only be applied to the income over that amount. I mean I wonder if Ed even gets it.

Bozita

(26,955 posts)
12. Thank you. I agree.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:43 AM
Oct 2012

Ed wasn't explaining it as well as he could.

His mom was a teacher. Ed isn't.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,330 posts)
4. I hope Ed also pointed out tax rates are based on Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) -- AFTER deductions.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:33 AM
Oct 2012

In other words, if this guy owns a home and/or pays a mortgage, or pays RE taxes, or contributes to a 401k, or ALL OF THE ABOVE he isn't affected.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,330 posts)
34. You are correct. I misspoke.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 02:02 PM
Oct 2012

Even his AGI probably isn't over $250K (with 4 kids in college I believe tuition comes off agi. no? Iras? Yes?)... and surely his taxable isn't over $250k. No fucking way.

All these Joe The Plumbers who "make $250k" need to be laughed off the stage when they complain. There sure are a lot of $250k earners these days. Eh? And they are all calling in to radio shows. Gee, you wouldn't think that was the top 2%(?) or anything.

When they start to get over the $300k plus range - maybe $350k then they can start to whine about their tax increase. Even then they should be told to STFU!

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
10. He will cling to that $525 bucks like a tick on a dog, and lose his ass on his house when the bank
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:37 AM
Oct 2012

wrongfully forecloses.

LuvLoogie

(7,011 posts)
13. The President rarely explains...
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:49 AM
Oct 2012

the nature of his proposed tax increase. In fact I only recall him mentioning one time that the increase only effects the income above 250G--that the first 250 is taxed at the current rate. I found out about it through my own research. It is a simple thing to explain, but the President never explains it. He might be now, however.


renate

(13,776 posts)
16. welcome to DU!
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 03:04 AM
Oct 2012

And I agree. I don't think this is emphasized NEARLY enough. In fact, I've never heard it spelled out like this at all, and I think that would be an enormous help in making the idea of a tax increase on those in the range between way-upper-middle-class and absurdly-rich more palatable to even the way-upper-middle-class.

KSstellarcat

(50 posts)
14. I heard that call.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:53 AM
Oct 2012

He really wasn't being a jackass. Once he was told that it was only the amount above $250,000, he commented that he wasn't aware of that. To be honest, neither was I. Of course, I make nowhere near that amount, so...

I agree that this needs to be explained better and more frequently.

Iwillnevergiveup

(9,298 posts)
20. He doesn't.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 03:28 AM
Oct 2012

Probably a right winger tool calling in with a phony story. Might be paid a pittance to disrupt.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
24. You would be surprised how absolutely stupid some rich people are.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:23 AM
Oct 2012

They just lucked into their wealth or inherited. It doesn't take brains for either one. Just look at Romney's campaign.

JI7

(89,252 posts)
29. and the people on that Romney video including Romney himself and their foreign policy discussion
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 06:11 AM
Oct 2012

that's why i love Lawrence o'donnells "stupid rich people" line.

 

DirtyDawg

(802 posts)
17. Actually...
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 03:09 AM
Oct 2012

...you're all wrong. The 'proposed' increase is 3.5 percentage points, or an approximate 10% increase on earnings above the $250k. Regardless, it's a pittance.

ToxMarz

(2,169 posts)
21. I heard it. It was incredibly hard to listen to
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 03:37 AM
Oct 2012

On both sides. Sometimes Ed is too quick to pick a fight or become defensive. And the guy I think was generally ignorant and being honestly ignorant. I have worked as an independent contractor for almost 20 years with others that as successful as they are can't add 2 + 2. They file their taxes based on what the accountant says, and get sucked into the disinformation and think they are victims. The guy really did start to get it at the end, but I think Ed was just starting to get it at the same time.

JohnnyRingo

(18,636 posts)
23. I should have such woes.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:10 AM
Oct 2012

What's it like to take home nearly a quarter million dollars? You wouldn't hear a peep out of me about taxes if I subsisted on that kind of dough.

On the bright side, he stopped paying his share of Social Security in April of this year, but someday he'll be there at the mailbox every month for the rest of his life. Like he needs it.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
25. The cap on SS taxes should be eliminated
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:42 AM
Oct 2012

But regardless of that, it shouldn't matter whether he needs the SS or not - if he paid into it, he should be able to collect it, period.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
26. I think that's wrong. It's less. More like $70 on the next 100K$.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 06:03 AM
Oct 2012

It's not 3% added, it's a 3% increase on the rate. So, it would be 3% of the tax not the gross.

So, if he paid 20% effective rate which is one-fifth his gross, one-fifth of that $500 would really be a $100 increase.

IIRC, it actually calculates out to $70 higher in taxes for the first 100K$ of adjusted gross income for AGI of 300K over just making 200K.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
28. No
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 06:08 AM
Oct 2012

The increase is in the marginal rate. As a result, the effective rate will increase as well, effective rates are meaningless to the IRS - taxes are calculated based on marginal rates.

JI7

(89,252 posts)
27. if he is making that much money wouldn't he already know that ? caller could be a "joe the plumber"
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 06:07 AM
Oct 2012

type . how he lied about some business he was going to buy.

cling2reality

(56 posts)
32. yes the population is dumbed down so much
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 08:52 AM
Oct 2012

that a major element of the 2004 campaign was based on the fact that Americans do not understand the difference between gross and net on business income. That is what drove the Joe the P narrative.

Now we have people at high and low income levels who do not even understand how progressive tax brackets work or how you only pay taxes on income left after deductions.

If this guy has as least 15,001 in deductions (which I am sure he does) he will pay no tax increase under Obama's plan. The repub politicians know this just like they knew the gross vs net thing with Joe the P. They just count on most people not understanding it so they keep lying.

The Dems have to get out of John Kerry mode and get basic. They need to go old school with some simple charts showing how the tax brackets work. Stop assuming people understand it. They do not. (I recommend they contact Ben Netanyahu's graphics department. Putting the message aside, he used a simplistic illustration and magic marker in a speech to the heads of nations from around the globe. That is some explaining !!)

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
31. well some people who make this kind of money.....
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 08:17 AM
Oct 2012

have less at the end of the week than a middle class family.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
37. If you're pulling down $265,000 and you have less at the end of the week
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 02:09 PM
Oct 2012

than somebody making $70,000 under normal circumstances, then you are an unmitigated dumbass.

Being stupid and profligate does not buy one out of one's social obligations.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Big Ed had a radio caller...