Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat to Watch for in the Presidential Debates by George Lakoff
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/10/02Ive been applying cognitive linguistics and neuroscience to politics in six books over the past two decades. The ideas in those books were on display in many of the speeches at the Democratic National Convention. Look for them in the debates. They include:
*All politics is based on moral values, with strict conservatives and progressives having different moral values.
*There are also morally complex voters moderates, independents, swing voters who are progressive on some issues and conservative on others. The activation of one in the brain turns of
*All issues are conceptually framed that is, they have a mental structure that fits ones moral system.
Facts matter, but only when they clearly fit ones morally-based frames. Facts and figures, when used, should create a moral point in a memorable way. And if the facts don't fit your frames, the frames stay (since they are in your brain) and the facts are ignored or ridiculed.
*Political language is rarely neutral. Because all words are defined in conceptual frames, all political language is defined in terms of morally-based frames.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 708 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What to Watch for in the Presidential Debates by George Lakoff (Original Post)
xchrom
Oct 2012
OP
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)1. potus and veep have been doing this ver well for months now
eridani
(51,907 posts)2. Lakoff after-debate commentary
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/10/04-0
You dont win a presidential debate by being a policy wonk. Obama violated all the basics of presidential debating. The best defense is a good offense. You have to set the terms of the debate and press those terms. Obama failed. Here are those basics:
(Photo: Reuters)
State your moral values. Contrast them with your opponents.
Project empathy and enthusiasm. Connect.
Communicate clearly and simply.
Be authentic. Say just what you believe.
Project trust.
Present an authentic view of yourself that the public can identify with and be proud of.
Obama did none of this. Instead he talked about policy details.
He needed to come on strong from the first sentence.
Democracy is based on citizens caring about and taking responsibility for both themselves as for the well-being of all. Government is the instrument that citizens use to guarantee protection and empowerment for all. We all, together, provide what is needed for a decent life. Individual accomplishment rests on what other Americans have provided and keep providing.