Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING: Judge halts Pennsylvania's tough new voter ID requirement; appeal is possible. - @AP
I don't have a link - this was on my company's Facebook page!!
Good news!!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1128 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Judge halts Pennsylvania's tough new voter ID requirement; appeal is possible. - @AP (Original Post)
RockaFowler
Oct 2012
OP
outsideworld
(601 posts)1. Omg
This is exciting .....or can this be over turned by an appeal
Webster Green
(13,905 posts)2. Any appeal should take place after the election.
This shit is getting ridiculous. These laws are doing irreparable harm to voters.
Spazito
(50,365 posts)3. That's great news!
An appeal won't go anywhere because the higher court already sent it back and this is the decision.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)4. Here's a link I found:
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20121002_Pa__Court_rules_voters_can_cast_ballots_without_ID.html
Sounds like mixed news, not sure if it will meet the standards the SC gave to this partisan judge to meet.
Doesn't sound like it to me, anyway.
(upon further reading)
Sounds like mixed news, not sure if it will meet the standards the SC gave to this partisan judge to meet.
Doesn't sound like it to me, anyway.
(upon further reading)
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)5. The article isn't particularly clear, but it looks like we won. The Patriot-News will cover it.