Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ck4829

(35,077 posts)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:51 AM Oct 2012

Worst job in the fact-checker career: Fact-checking Michele Bachmann

Michele Bachmann’s statements during the Republican primary debates were so error-strewn that the Associated Press implemented a “quota” on how many claims they would fact-check.

AP editor Jim Drinkard, who oversees the fact-checking, said in a panel yesterday: “We had to have a self-imposed Michele Bachmann quota in some of those debates.”

From the Washington Post:

“After the session, Drinkard said that there wasn’t an actual numerical quota on Bachmann at the AP. It’s just that if the AP had gone back and vetted all her claims that looked dicey, the result would ‘overload’ the debate story. ‘Often she was just more prone to statements that just didn’t add up,’ said Drinkard.”

One more infamous instance of those statements was when Bachmann said that the HPV vaccine could have “very dangerous side effects,” a claim that was quickly refuted by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the CDC, and basically everyone else.

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/ap_had_a_bachmann_fact_check_quota/
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Worst job in the fact-checker career: Fact-checking Michele Bachmann (Original Post) ck4829 Oct 2012 OP
Fact-checking Batshit is like trying to empty Lake Superior hifiguy Oct 2012 #1
I tried that many years ago TrogL Oct 2012 #4
"it would overload the debate story" Enrique Oct 2012 #2
Or the Gish Gallop ck4829 Oct 2012 #3
You ain't seen nothin' yet! VWolf Oct 2012 #8
Why is that so hard? Just mark "WRONG" next to every sentence. HopeHoops Oct 2012 #5
It would be easier if they only made a report on the factual things she said ck4829 Oct 2012 #6
Were there any? HopeHoops Oct 2012 #9
There is a very simple method Flashmann Oct 2012 #7
Not the worst job janlyn Oct 2012 #10

ck4829

(35,077 posts)
3. Or the Gish Gallop
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:58 AM
Oct 2012

Something creationists use and I've only seen righties using it as well, where they just throw out bull at lightning fast speed.

Flashmann

(2,140 posts)
7. There is a very simple method
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:17 PM
Oct 2012

That also applies to rmoney/lyan,as well as several other RWers...As they utter a string of words,are their lips moving?......If yes,then lying can be presumed..

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Worst job in the fact-che...