State Control of Electors to Electoral College
Some states have passed laws that require their electors to vote as pledged. These laws may either impose a fine on an elector who fails to vote according to the statewide or district popular vote, or may disqualify an elector who violates his or her pledge and provide a replacement elector. In July 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to enact this type of law. The states with laws that attempt to bind the votes of presidential electors are below:
Most of the laws cited above require electors to vote for the candidate of the party that nominated the elector, or require the elector to sign a pledge to do so. Some go further: Oklahoma imposes a civil penalty of $1,000; in North Carolina, the fine is $500, the faithless elector is deemed to have resigned, and a replacement is appointed. In South Carolina, an elector who violates his or her pledge is subject to criminal penalties, and in New Mexico a violation is a fourth degree felony. In Michigan, a candidate who fails to vote as required is considered to have resigned, and a replacement is appointed.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/the-electoral-college.aspx
Scroll down to faithless electors.
Sorry, with one hand out of business due to chemo-induced neuropathy, I cannot post the list of states properly. The columns don't line up. Plus, I am very ill right now with chemo side effects. I bolded the link.
This is part of the R's plan to ensure tRump remains in office, IMO.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Sorry to hear you aren't feeling well. Healing vibes on the way! 💗💗💗