General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNBC/WSJ poll: Obama maintains lead, but Romney within striking distance (LOL!) - updated
Last edited Tue Oct 2, 2012, 07:42 PM - Edit history (1)
By Mark Murray, NBC News Senior Political Editor
On the eve of the first presidential debate, President Barack Obama maintains his national lead over Mitt Romney, but the Republican nominee is well within striking distance, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
Obama edges Romney by three points among likely voters, 49 percent to 46 percent, which is within the surveys margin of error. Obamas lead was five points, 50 percent to 45 percent, in the NBC/WSJ poll released two weeks ago, following the political conventions.
But among a wider pool of registered voters, the president is ahead of Romney by seven points, 51 percent to 44 percent.
<...>
Whats more, by a 2-to-1 margin, these voters have a negative reaction to Romneys comment caught on tape from a fundraiser back in May that 47 percent of Americans are dependent on government and believe they are victims.
Why the race is closer among likely voters
Among the full universe of registered voters in the poll, Obama leads Romney with African Americans (95 percent to 3 percent), Latinos (winning seven in 10), women (56 percent to 40 percent), and independents (48 percent to 35 percent).
- more -
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/02/14186700-nbcwsj-poll-obama-maintains-lead-but-romney-within-striking-distance
So Obama is down a point among likely voters (Romney is up a point), Obama is up one point among registered voters, and Mitt doesn't stand a chance among African Americans, Latinos, women and independents, but hey...Mitt is in striking distance!!!
Updated to add:
Presdient Obama leads Republican Mitt Romney by 3 points amongst likely voters nationally, 49 percent to Romney's 46 percent, in a new poll from NBC News and the Wall Street Journal.
"For Obama, hes ahead at a time of growing optimism about the economy and nations direction," NBC's FirstRead blog wrote. "For Romney, its a 'margin of error' contest that comes as interest in the upcoming election lags among key Democratic constituencies versus four years ago." There is evidence in the poll that Americans are feeling better about the economy -- 57 percent of registered voters said the nation is recovering while 39 percent said it was not. Just a two weeks ago NBC/WSJ asked the same question, and only 51 percent said it was recovering, while 45 percent said the opposite. More from NBC:
The poll which was conducted Sept. 26-30 comes after intense scrutiny and TV-ad attacks on Romneys 47 percent comment, in which he said that percentage of Americans dont pay income taxes, are dependent on government, and believe that they are victims.
After hearing a full description of that comment, 45 percent of registered voters said it gave them a more negative impression of the GOP presidential nominee, versus 23 percent who had a more positive view.
<...>
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/nbc-wsj-obama-by-3-points-nationally-57
Mitt is toast!
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)The muck is getting deeper and deeper.
I am so longing for a broken dam effect.
Redlo Nosrep
(111 posts)Nah, the Mittster already has it in the bag:
"...I also predicted that the Presidential race between Obama and Romney would be very close until election day. But that on election day Romney would win by a landslide similar to Reagan-Carter in 1980.
Understanding history, today I am even more convinced of a resounding Romney victory. 32 years ago at this moment in time, Reagan was losing by 9 points to Carter. Romney is right now running even in polls. So why do most pollsters give Obama the edge?
First, most pollsters are missing one ingredient- common sense." (MORE)
http://www.livetradingnews.com/las-vegas-has-romney-in-the-lead-87797.htm
If you can't believe a former Libertarian vice-presidential nominee who's now an odds-maker in Vegas, who CAN you trust?
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)Striking distance... sure, if Romney's got arms like Gumby.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)hlthe2b
(102,292 posts)So, what? "Likely Voters" include only those with residences in the reddest part of each state?
Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)and I must say, the glee on Chuck Todd's face is like a kid at a candy store, he is desperately trying to make this a close race.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Many of Registered Voters won't vote, and don't historically vote. A lot of young registered voters, for example, plan to vote, but don't get around to it, stats show.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)the sampling can show bias. This is what Republicans fear.
The overall voting age (18 and older) citizen population in the United States in 2008 was 206 million compared with 197 million in 2004. Of that total, 146 million, or 71 percent, reported being registered to vote. That's slightly lower than the 72 percent who reported being registered to vote in the 2004 presidential election, but does represent an increase of approximately 4 million registered voters. The percentage of those registered to vote that actually did so was slightly higher in the 2008 election (90 percent) than in 2004 (89 percent).
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/voting/cb09-110.html
0rganism
(23,957 posts)it's pretty clear what's happening, just a question of how long the media wants to draw this thing out in hopes of ginning up ad revenue and viewership.