If Rudy, Jenna, and Sidney actually had any evidence, is there a legal reason why...

[bbernardini]

...they couldn't just release it all to the public?

[grumpyduck]

1. Methinks they're milking the story,

just like the Rocky, Batman, and other movie franchises.

[struggle4progress]

2. "Better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to remove all doubt"

[durablend]

4. They're *well* past that point by now...

[C_U_L8R]

3. It's a PR strategy, not a legal one.

But the courts should put an end to this abuse.

[TDale313]

5. There is no evidence of fraud.

Every one of their lawyers asked in front of a judge (where there are consequences for lying) had admitted as much.

[COLGATE4]

6. This way they can keep bleeding the intellectually

challenged to just 'send in whatever you can - $5, $10, $20, $50 or more to help President Trump defeat the massive conspiracy that's trying to steal the election from him'.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

7. They're placating His Lardship and keeping the grift going.

[Happy Hoosier]

8. All they have...

are affidavits and some really dodgy data "analysis." They have nothing else.

if rudy had any actual evidence, he'd file a suit that actually alleges fraud. But he hasn't, so.....

[Voltaire2]

9. see sarah cooper.

She explained that real good lawyers keep evidence to themselves and never present it in court.

Link to tweet

?s=20

and

Link to tweet

?s=20

and

Link to tweet

?s=20