General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA 2020 Surprise: Fewer Absentee Ballots Rejections Than Expected
I know that the Texas party made an effort to have have poll watchers at signature verification committees/ballot board meetings to be able to contact voters whose ballots were rejected. In Georgia, Florida and other states ther ewere consent decrees in place requiring the county to notify voters whose ballots were rejected and giving them an opportunity to cure. These efforts appear to have worked https://www.npr.org/2020/12/31/951249068/a-2020-surprise-fewer-absentee-ballots-rejections-than-expected?utm_campaign=storyshare&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social
"So early voting, drop box. Checked the supervisor of elections website a couple of days later and it was tabulated," he said. "It worked swell."
That was a relief for Nielsen, whose vote did not count in 2018. His ballot arrived too late, despite being mailed more than a week before Election Day......
As in many other states, Florida made it easier this year for voters to fix, or "cure," their ballots. For example, Florida's mail-in ballot envelopes included space where voters could provide their email address or phone number, allowing election officials to contact them more quickly about mistakes, so they could be fixed on time.
That change also provided crucial contact information for campaigns and interest groups, so they too could reach out to voters to make sure that their ballots counted. And indeed, many groups did just that, helping their supporters cure their ballots as part of aggressive get-out-the-vote campaigns.
Jared Dearing, executive director of Kentucky's board of elections, says his state also took steps to help absentee voters after more than 25,000 ballots were rejected in the June primary. Prior to the pandemic, only about 2% of Kentucky voters cast their ballots by mail, compared with 75% this year. There were some growing pains.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)VarryOn
(2,343 posts)theyd point it out and allow you to cure the issue before you left the polling station. So, it makes sense to allow mail-in voters the same opportunity to fix their errors. I dont know why this is a debate unless Simone is making a bad-faith argument to the contrary.
A few counties in PA, didnt contact mail-in voters who needed to fix errors. Thankfully, the larger counties did. I dont know if MI, WI, GA, et al had similar variances among their counties. Id be pissed is my countys election officials didnt actively work to reduce the rejection percentage.
While it went the wrong way, I am glad FL showed a large state showed you can actively work to minimize rejected ballots AND get votes tallied on Election Day. I guess they did learn a lesson in 2000!