General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonald Trump Drags Biglaw Firm Into Middle Of Election Interference Effort
Foley is not having fun https://abovethelaw.com/2021/01/donald-trump-drags-biglaw-firm-into-middle-of-election-interference-effort/
But what made this call so incredible is that the lawyer Trump chose to bring with him wasnt drawn from the bumbling crew of free agents willing to trade their professional credibility for an opportunity to leak hair dye on national television, but Foley & Lardners Cleta Mitchell. Mitchell was already brazenly spreading myths about voter fraud on all the networks that Trump likes to watch, so it was perhaps inevitable that hed reach out. What wasnt inevitable is that a Biglaw firm would allow one of their partners to officially drag them into this mess.
This isnt the first time Mitchells practice has put Foley & Lardner in the hot seat. She was caught on tape running a gerrymandering seminar where she advised state legislators to destroy their notes before they go home so they wont become part of a discovery request. Document retention policies are, fundamentally, about making sure material doesnt end up getting produced, but its a considerable leap from we delete all your emails older than six months to dont take notes because were about to commit some civil rights violations. Thats some Stringer Bell stuff right there.
But gerrymandering is the polite form of disenfranchisement. Its the sort of thing Ben Ginsberg could devote his life to and still get a pat on the back from MSNBC. Leaning on state election officials to conjure up favorable votes is a lot harder for a major law firm to spin
MontanaMama
(23,337 posts)then they're going to get sued, I would think. When in the hell will these people be held accountable for their crimes???
onenote
(42,778 posts)MontanaMama
(23,337 posts)without her firm's permission, that's a no-no. She could definitely be fired from the firm for that. As far as who might sue her? I guess anyone who believes they may have been wronged by her actions...she is actively telling people how to break the law.
onenote
(42,778 posts)Her client Trump could sue her for malpractice but thats never going to happen.
She wont be fired but I wouldnt be surprised if she and the firm negotiate a settlement that involves her leaving but with some cash in her pockets.
ananda
(28,879 posts)For years, my area has not been represented in Congress
because my rep is elected by people 150 miles away.
I'm still angry.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)When a firm has to make a public statement trying explain something an attorney had done without their authorization, that attorney isn't likely to be there much longer.
onenote
(42,778 posts)In order avoid ugly and expensive litigation, I expect that she and the firm will negotiate a separation agreement where she leaves with some cash in her pockets and no public statements about her having given the firm cause to terminate her.
That may be why they haven't gotten rid of her yet.
Gothmog
(145,628 posts)I am so glad that I am no longer at a big firm but my son just made partner at a big firm
Tetrachloride
(7,876 posts)Some of these offices are in the heart of blue areas.
I have been to a Foley and Lardner office.
And at least one of the lawyers there was mighty blue.
A boycott would put them in another kind of blue. I believe the branch offices in blue areas will take action to main prestige, both in the short run and the long run.
Gothmog
(145,628 posts)This was predictable. Big Law does not like radicals
Link to tweet
Mitchells resignation came after the law firm on Monday issued a statement saying it was concerned by her role in the call. The firm noted that as a matter of policy, its attorneys do not represent any parties seeking to contest the results of the election.
The Washington Post on Sunday published audio and a transcript of the hour-long call in which Trump pressured Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to overturn the election results. During the call, Mitchell complained that she had not been given access to certain information from Raffenspergers office, and Trump relied on her to an extraordinary degree during the call.,....
In its statement on Tuesday, the law firm said: Cleta Mitchell has informed firm management of her decision to resign from Foley & Lardner effective immediately. Ms. Mitchell concluded that her departure was in the firms best interests, as well as in her own personal best interests. We thank her for her contributions to the firm and wish her well.
ProfessorGAC
(65,223 posts)"Now, sign it & get out!"