General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums538 "The Police's Tepid Response To The Capitol Breach Wasn't An Aberration"
(sorry - my aim was off - went to the Lounge, now in its proper place - thanks Kali!)
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-polices-tepid-response-to-the-capitol-breach-wasnt-an-aberration/
Authorities are more than twice as likely to break up a left-wing protest than a right-wing protest.
By Maggie Koerth
As images from Wednesdays riot by pro-Trump extremists at the U.S. Capitol filled our TV screens and social media feeds, one thing was notably absent: the kind of confrontation between police and protesters that we saw during the Black Lives Matter protests last summer. Even though the Capitol mob was far more violent and seditious than the largely peaceful BLM demonstrators, police responded far less aggressively toward them than toward BLM protesters across the country. Researchers who track this sort of thing for a living say that fits a pattern.
Instead of National Guard troops being posted en masse around landmarks before a protest even began, we saw the Defense Department initially deny a request to send in troops and that was after the Capitol had been breached. Instead of peaceful protesters being doused in tear gas, we saw a mob posing for selfies with police and being allowed to wander the corridors of power like they couldnt decide whether they were invading the Capitol or touring it. Instead of President Trump calling these violent supporters thugs, as he called racial justice protesters, and advocating for more violent police crackdowns, we saw him remind his followers that they were loved before asking them nicely to go home. It feels really unbelievable, said Roudabeh Kishi, director of research and innovation with the nonprofit Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project. But, she said, its also totally unsurprising.
Thats because the discrepancies we saw Wednesday are just another example of a trend Kishis team has been tracking for months as they collect data on protester and law enforcement interactions across America. We see a different response to the right wing, she said.
snip
Between May 1 and November 28, 2020, authorities were more than twice as likely to attempt to break up and disperse a left-wing protest1 than a right-wing2 one. And in those situations when law enforcement chose to intervene, they were more likely to use force 34 percent of the time with right-wing protests compared with 51 percent of the time for the left. Given when this data was collected, it predominantly reflects a difference in how police respond to Black Lives Matter, compared with how they respond to anti-mask demonstrations, pro-Trump extremists, QAnon rallies, and militia groups. The differences in intervention werent because BLM protests were particularly violent. ACLED found that 93 percent of the protests associated with BLM were entirely peaceful. Even if we were to put those [7] percent of demonstrations aside and look purely at peaceful [BLM protests], we are seeing a more heavy handed response [compared with right-wing protests], Kishi said.
snip
The police, meanwhile, he worries, are likely to see criticism of a lack of force in D.C. and respond with more force elsewhere whether that be against right-wing or left-wing groups. Every other police department facing an angry crowd will be concerned about being overrun, and overcorrecting in response to that concern may lead to overly forceful, unconstitutional responses.
Violence, as they say, begets violence. And disparities in police force may well beget more disparities.
2
underpants
(182,861 posts)MarcA
(2,195 posts)The Roux Comes First
(1,300 posts)In the pursuit of elevated power and authority over others, it seems to me that that pursuit inevitably means at least some of them are natural colleagues with, and sympatico with, right-wing white male organizations, i.e., white supremacists.