General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe need to repeal and replace the 1887 election law.
Last edited Sun Jan 10, 2021, 12:01 PM - Edit history (1)
that allowed Cruz and Hawley to pull their seditious stunt.
Their should be no objections to uncontested certified elector slates. Period.
ResistantAmerican17
(3,810 posts)Does Rafael or Josh have to do with Pennsylvania law? Fucking hate em Lloyd.
kwolf68
(7,365 posts)It's state's rights...with their exception. Hypocritical scumbags. But that's not anything new for the Republican Terror Organization, the Bush W admin sued states for enacting their own CAFE standards. States rights, only when it serves me.
dutch777
(3,031 posts)Clearly lots for the Biden admin to work on to prevent Trumpian nonsense in the future. And take the filibuster away from Moscow Mitch
servermsh
(913 posts)It absolutely needs reform. Fortunately we control all necessary branches to reform it.
They should only be able to object to whether the certificates themselves are valid. Meaning narrow cases like, the governor didn't sign, etc. For a case like this year, even with bogus "slates", the language should be clear so that those bogus certs would be out of order.
We only have to allow for very rare circumstances where a state somehow manages to send multiple slates (which has occurred).
comradebillyboy
(10,174 posts)Takket
(21,607 posts)yellowcanine
(35,701 posts)MoonlitKnight
(1,584 posts)Instead of requiring a Rep and Senator to sign a written request, it should also specify that there must be at least two official slates presented and received. That was the original intent of the law. It was enacted because some states presented two tallies from two different slates of electors.
Demsrule86
(68,632 posts)yellowcanine
(35,701 posts)Than Congress to resolve certification disputes.