Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Abortions on Women Who Aren't Pregnant' Common Trope of Anti-Choice Movement
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/10/03Reproductive rights reporter (and RH Reality Check weekly columnist) Amanda Marcotte writes Tuesday that Missouri Congressman and Republican Senate candidate Todd Akin, already well-known for his solidly anti-choice positions, gave a speech in 2008 in which he states that, among other things, abortion providers perform abortions on "women who are not actually pregnant."
To many readers, that would seem like a bizarre statement. After all, you can't have an abortion unless you are pregnant! But for the culture of anti-choice activists that see providers as monsters and women as gullible victims, this is almost religiously-accepted fact.
Carol Everett, a former clinic worker in the 70's who then "converted" and became an outspoken icon for the anti-choice movement, was fond of telling stories of the horrors she allegedly assisted with when she was in the "abortion industry." She once provided a testimonial on James Dobson's Focus on the Family's radio program in the 80's where she claimed she was constantly involved in "unneeded" abortions in order to make money.
<snip>
It's ironic when you think about it, however. On one hand, anti-choice activists are declaring that a woman is pregnant before a pregnancy test could even confirm it, or that a fertilized egg not implanting in the womb somehow is the loss of a complete and separate fully formed life. At the same time, they are also completely convinced that there is a mass undertaking by doctors to perform pregnancy terminations on women who aren't in fact even medically pregnant.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1059 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Abortions on Women Who Aren't Pregnant' Common Trope of Anti-Choice Movement (Original Post)
eridani
Oct 2012
OP
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)1. Sound like they have the same problem with lobotomies
TexasBushwhacker
(20,202 posts)2. All I had was a yeast infection ...
but they gave me an abortion anyway.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)3. I had one of those
to save my life after I lost a baby. It's called a D&C, assholes
eridani
(51,907 posts)4. Was that really an abortion?
The woman-killers seem to think that this is done to inflate a clinic's bottom line.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)6. no
but that's gotta be what they're counting, they're just too stupid or craven to know the difference.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)5. That's . . . um . . . not really possible